One
Billion Dollars
by
David Dieteman
Perhaps
you have seen Austin
Powers, in which case you likely recall Dr. Evil’s demand
for "one billion dollars" from the nations of the world.
Perhaps
you have seen the news, where another demand for one billion dollars
has been made. President Bush, taking an apparent break from his
efforts to turn Iraq into the 51st state and combat "cosmic
injustice," is reportedly "seeking" one billion dollars
for that worthiest of causes – the eternally under-funded public
schools.
"Seeking,"
my eye.
Mr.
Bush knows where his billion dollars of sugar-daddy cash will come
from: compulsory taxation.
In
his weekly radio address, the president put it this way: "Too
many students and lower income families fall behind early, resulting
in a terrible gap in test scores between these students and their
more fortunate peers."
The
obvious political solution (i.e., obvious to the political
class), then, is to impoverish everyone else by increasing spending
on tax-funded schools.
Query
whether factors other than family income and educational spending
might be responsible for educational failure. In that regard, consider
the federal government’s hometown, Washington, DC. The city with
the worst public schools in the nation (Washington, DC) spends the
most on education per pupil.
Funny
that.
The
Democrats, of course, are yet more despicable than the crusading
Bush. One noted paragon of American freedom, Ted Kennedy, predictably
branded the billion dollars of additional federal spending as "pocket
change."
Mr.
Kennedy has apparently not considered how many peoples’ pockets
are picked to provide the federal government with one billion dollars.
What
is at work in the phony "debate" over how much more money
to throw down the black hole of the public schools is the nature
of contemporary American democracy, namely, base pandering for political
gain. This base pandering is to be distinguished from the pursuit
of any genuine notion of the common good.
As
Plato put it in the Gorgias,
American politicians are gluttons: men who regale the American people
by giving them what they desire, in the way that fools feed only
junk food to children who prefer junk food to nutrition.
The
masses clamor for "more money for schools" – never thinking
where such money is to come from – and so the enlightened despots
in Washington shall shower the masses with cash. Free cash!
The
result? Government at every level is bloated, and American society,
in places, is rotten to the core.
As
Socrates put it, our politicians:
have
glutted the state with harbours and dockyards and walls and
tribute and rubbish of that sort, regardless of the requirements
of moderation and righteousness…
No
one but the educational establishment will benefit from giving more
money to the public schools. Rather than give up one billion dollars,
the American public should demand a different course of action,
namely, that the government get out of a business in which it has
no business: education.
January
6, 2003
Mr.
Dieteman [send him mail] is
an attorney in Erie, Pennsylvania, and a PhD candidate in philosophy
at The Catholic University of America.
©
2003 David Dieteman
David
Dieteman Archives
|