About
Time
by
David Dieteman
A
federal appeals court has ruled that the Bush administration cannot
conduct secret trials in the name of the "war on terrorism."
The
Washington
Post
reports that the opinion from the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of
Appeals
in the case
of Michigan activist Rabih Haddad marked the first time since
Sept. 11 that a major component of the Bush administration’s legal
approach to the anti-terrorism campaign has been declared unconstitutional
at the appeals court level, which is a step below the Supreme
Court in the federal judicial hierarchy.
As
senior Judge Damon J. Keith wrote,
The
Executive Branch seeks to uproot people’s lives, outside the public
eye, and behind a closed door. Democracies die behind closed doors.
The First Amendment, through a free press, protects the people’s
right to know that their government acts fairly, lawfully, and
accurately in deportation proceedings.
Well
put.
It’s
about time that the Bush administration’s loony restrictions on
American liberties were placed in check.
Since
September 11, Americans have been told not to question the government.
When postal workers died of anthrax, representatives of the postal
service dared to state on national television that it was an inappropriate
time to question their decision to send workers into potentially
toxic environments.
Try
that in the private sector, and see how quickly your business is
shut down. Not the time to question authority, indeed!
The
government must bear heavy blame for September 11 and for the foreign
policy blunders since that time. It is the federal government which
"guaranteed" airline safety, and which recklessly pursued
a pro-Israel policy in the Middle East (even though the Vatican
has condemned Israel as aggressors against the Palestinians).
It
is the federal government that, in the wake of September 11, has
resorted to interrogating old women and harassing peaceful American
citizens, rather than sensibly targeting Arabic travelers or restricting
immigration.
It
is also the federal government which remains committed to the supreme
folly of believing it can create "peace in our time" by
making war on Afghanistan and al Qaeda.
Consider
the following item, also from the Washington Post:
Central
Asia's leaders consider the U.S. presence here the inauguration
of a new era. Islam Karimov, the uncompromising leader of Uzbekistan,
was held at arm's length by the United States for years because
of his authoritarian policies. He now sees himself as an important
U.S. ally. Since his friendly visit with President Bush last spring
and the signing of a formal agreement committing the United States
to respond to "any external threat" to Uzbekistan, Karimov said
in an interview, his country has "a strategic partnership with
the United States."
The
thugs of yesterday are the allies of today. How this is supposed
to be a good idea is beyond me. It is, additionally, odd that the
United States would agree to protect Uzbekistan from "any external
threat. So much for George Washington’s warning against "entangling
alliances," and so much for the lessons of pre-World War One
Europe.
The
Post further reports that Kathleen Collins, a professor at
Notre Dame, has opined that Central Asia is "not in transition
to democracy, but…heading down a political and economic trajectory
that can only be called sharply negative."
Central
Asia is not where American tax dollars should be spent. What is
the benefit to American national interests of the estimated $5 billion
spent on our mission to Afghanistan each month?
The
Bush administration, despite the facts of its involvement in Afghanistan,
dares to criticize corporations for fraudulent accounting.
The
Sixth Circuit’s opinion is a welcome obstacle on the road to disaster
traveled by the Bush administration.
August
30, 2002
Mr.
Dieteman [send him mail] is
an attorney in Erie, Pennsylvania, and a PhD candidate in philosophy
at The Catholic University of America.
©
2002 David Dieteman
David
Dieteman Archives
|