What
Is a Government?
by
David Dieteman
Some
Americans are in the thralls of a love affair with "the government."
Unfortunately, this is a blind crush. Most Americans would not be
able to recognize "the government" if they saw it.
What
is a government? Does the idea of government transcend the policies
of the current regime and stand for a more general proposition?
Is government something to love?
Government
is merely the stripes on the road, yellow paint on black asphalt.
It is street lights, fire hydrants, and prisons – on a good day.
On a best-case scenario (known as limited government, or "minarchism"),
the government exists to facilitate the peaceful interaction of
private individuals. It paints lines on the street to make traffic
flow more orderly and more predictable, and to minimize the destruction
of private property (or loss of precious human life) in automobile
accidents.
There
is nothing magical or deserving of affection in painting stripes
on a street. A private firm can paint stripes on a street better
than a bungling bureaucratic government which hires cronies and
cannot go out of business.
Think
of this the next time an egomaniac (i.e., politician) with delusions
of grandeur runs for office, spewing promises like a cheap hustler
picking up women in a bar. Keep in mind that the hustler, if he
is elected, will be in charge of having other men paint stripes
on the street. On the national level, the hustler may be in charge
of blowing up people who live far away.
Consider
the case of Turkey. As
the BBC reported, the Turkish government has been on
the verge of collapse. Not the whole system, mind you. Merely the
present coalition of parties and ministers, in other words, the
status quo with respect to who has the power.
The
"government" means the current regime, and not the entire
Turkish political system. The citizens of Turkey and the geographic
area known as Turkey will not cease to exist when "the government"
collapses. Instead, Hustler B, whom we are not used to seeing in
the news, will replace Hustler A.
Such
a transfer hardly merits the accompanying drama.
To
understand the drama, one must understand that politicians advertise
in the way that private firms advertise. Like Coca-Cola or Heineken,
a political regime seeks to create brand-name recognition, and to
connect the politician’s name to visible "accomplishments."
Similarly, like Coca-Cola or Heineken, a government is a fictional
entity, not a real person, but an artificial person created by a
piece of paper assigning rights, duties, and authority.
Of
course, very much unlike Coca-Cola, the government does not have
customers. The government, even a genuinely limited government,
employs force and coercion. You choose whether or not to buy a Coke.
You do not choose whether or not to go to jail if you fail to pay
your taxes.
Government
must be seen for what it is. At best, a government is a creation
of the citizenry. It exists only to serve the citizenry, and not
to subjugate them. Insofar as a government acts as if it created
the citizens, and treats citizens as subservient subjects, the government
loses its raison d’etre. Thus, bad governments are a justification
for rebellion. (Thomas Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence sets
forth these principles quite nicely).
In
the American political system, the people are sovereign. "The
government," whether local, state, or federal, is merely a
tool for the people to protect themselves and their private property.
That is the general proposition, in the American political tradition,
which transcends the current regime. This general proposition is
made concrete in the form of low taxes, minimal regulations, and
a general attitude of laissez-faire.
Judged
by that standard, "the government" that is the current
regime is hardly deserving of affection.
July
17, 2002
Mr.
Dieteman [send him mail] is
an attorney in Erie, Pennsylvania, and a PhD candidate in philosophy
at The Catholic University of America.
©
2002 David Dieteman
David
Dieteman Archives
|