Umpire
Worship
by
David Dieteman
Spring
is nearly upon us, and so the mind turns to baseball.
Chiefly,
this means that the mind turns to pitchers, catchers, batters, and
fielders. Umpires, if they are given any thought, are in the back
of the mind.
The
umpire, after all, belongs in the back of the mind as he stands
in the back of, or rather behind, the plate. Properly, the umpire
is not a participant in the game of baseball, although, to
be sure, his actions will affect the outcome of the game. Imagine
a game in which not a single strike was called. This would be a
different sort of game.
The
game of baseball is about the players. The pitcher whose pinpoint
control, or blazing fastball, will keep opposing hitters off balance.
Or the hitter with the patience and bat control to hit .400 for
a season.
Consider,
then, how completely wrong things have gone in American politics.
No
longer is politics in America about the players, that is, about
the citizens. Instead, the game of politics in America is played
for the sake of the umpires, that is, for the government.
A
government, after all, may justify its existence only to the extent
that it ensures that things between the citizens run smoothly. It
does not exist to decide who wins and loses. If it does, it can
no longer claim to be impartial. And to be impartial would
seem to be a very important characteristic of an umpire.
Worse,
the government today exists for its own sake. It does not matter
that the government spends more than it takes by taxation. It does
not matter that programs may be wasting money that would be better
left in the pockets of average citizens. And it does not matter
if byzantine regulations make it harder and harder to earn a living.
There are new rules and regulations to be made, and the lot of the
citizen is to put up and shut up.
Human
beings are arguably lower on the federal preference chart than fish,
birds, or trees. Worse, human beings who do not happen to have millions
of dollars to donate to political candidates are lower on the governmental
preference chart than, well, Enron, for example.
Given
the tax and spend habits of the political class not only in Washington
DC, but in the state capitals, county councils and town halls across
the miles it would appear that many people, as far as the government
is concerned, exist only as a source of tax revenue for projects
whose main benefit is to appear on some politician's resume.
And
you thought you were worth something "as a human being." Well, you're
right: you are.
Human
beings are intrinsically valuable, because they are human. The government,
moreover, if it is to have any reason for existing, must serve individual
human beings. The test of a good government, then, is what the government
does to its masters, i.e., the citizens whom it serves. The good
government makes them better off, or, to put it more precisely,
the good government stands behind the plate lets them improve their
own lot by individual initiative.
Does
it make them poorer? Does it destroy their jobs by requiring them
to jump through hoops beyond comprehension at ruinous cost of compliance?
Does it take their land and their livelihood in the name of keeping
a vocal minority happy? Does it rule by bribes doling out favors
and special preferences to those who clamor and threaten?
The
good government will do none of the above. Instead, the good government
is the government which governs least and which thereby ensures
that the individual citizens will prosper in safety.
The
alternative to the government doing its job as umpire and staying
in the background is to see the government as umpire pick the winners
and the losers. It is to play the game of baseball not for victory,
or for they enjoyment of the fans, but so that the umpires will
have something to do, so that the umpires can be powerful and important.
It is to simply award the hitter first base when he has not swung
the bat, and has not been hit by the ball.
By
the way, if enough of the fans demand a change in baseball, the
change gets made. Witness the designated hitter, short fences, and
the complete reversal of day versus night games as compared to a
century ago. The fans pay for the tickets. The fans are the source
of revenue. And so the fans have an important say they have control over what goes on in the game.
The
same is true in politics if only the fans, i.e., the citizens,
would pay attention. The citizens pay the taxes. And the tax dollars
fund the wasteful, ridiculous programs for the special interests
and the cronies. If the citizens would bother to see how their money
is actually spent, and connect this spending to the voting booth,
things might get better. And it would not take very long.
Although
it is true that political change may take a long time to develop,
it may also happen rather quickly. Consider the fall of Communism
in Eastern Europe. Once the dominoes started falling, the game was
up.
Another
baseball season will soon be upon us. If only our local, state and
federal governments could be more like the umpires behind the
plate, and out of the way.
March
11, 2002
Mr.
Dieteman [send him mail] is
an attorney in Erie, Pennsylvania, and a PhD candidate in philosophy
at The Catholic University of America.
©
2002 David Dieteman
David
Dieteman Archives
LRC
needs your help to stay on the air.
|