On
the Home Front
by
David Dieteman
When
studying previous wars, a question which frequently occurred to
me was "How did people at home live with the war?"
What
was it like, wondering whether peace or more bloodshed was around
the corner? If the Afghan war is any indication, the home front
is relatively insulated from the horrors of combat. This remains
true in America today, where most Americans have only experienced
the carnage of September 11 via television or photographs. Those
who have been near Ground Zero inform me that the smell is terrible,
and that photographs do not in any way convey the reality of the
devastation.
With
respect to the expansion of governmental power, I confess to being
amazed. I expected that a week or so after the attacks, the President,
or another such high official, would declare that we must keep our
heads. Destroying liberty to save a free country, after all, makes
no sense. And yet it hasn't happened. The politicians have asked
us to snitch on likely terrorists, to continue using the monopoly
Postal Service (as if we have a choice about where to send letters),
and to continue to fly, even though our belongings will be inspected
in minute detail.
And
so it seems, as with every other war, the powers of the state shall
grow at the expense of civil society. Rather than getting better,
America is growing weaker and more sickly, as the compulsory state
expands at the expense of the revenue-producing cattle whom it allegedly
exists to serve (the cattle are we citizens).
What
to think? I think that things are going to get worse before they
get better. Perhaps I have no good reason to think so, but it is
my instinct. I will be only too happy to be proven wrong by subsequent
events.
Consider,
however, the War Between the States, and human nature in general.
The War between the States was a long time coming. To put it differently,
after the American colonies seceded from Mother England, it took
a great deal of provocation, usurpation, and fleecing before the
Southern states decided to secede from the voluntary compact known
as the Constitution.
This
fits with human nature. Generally, human beings will put up with
a great deal of discomfort before they are inclined to act. This
is a simple cost-benefits analysis. The costs of doing something,
especially something drastic, are often outweighed by the risks,
by the uncertainty of success, and by the knowledge that it could
always be worse.
It
seems, therefore, that the situation with respect to civil liberties
in America is going to get worse before it gets better. How much
worse is not a subject on which I can possibly speculate. How long
such a degradation of our civic life may last is not certain. One
hopes that there will be a push to repeal the extension of snooping
powers after the shooting has stopped and the terrorists have been
duly sent to their Maker.
In
order for that to happen, however, Americans will need to remain
vigilant, and they will need to ask for it to happen. Now that the
government has been given more money and more power, do not expect
the government to give it up on its own.
Things
may get worse from here. Despite this possibility, the so-called
"Republican revolution" of 1994, as limited and short-lived as it
was, gives us reason to remain hopeful. Americans are not likely
to forget how to throw the bums out at the ballot box.
November
23, 2001
Mr.
Dieteman [send him mail]
is an attorney in Erie, Pennsylvania, and a PhD candidate in philosophy
at The Catholic University of America.
©
2001 David Dieteman
David
Dieteman Archives
The
Truth Needs Your Support
Please
make a donation to help us tell it,
no matter what nefarious plans Leviathan has.
|