The Same Old Mindless Mantras
by
Sean Corrigan
by Sean Corrigan
Now,
it doesn’t take a degree in economics to be aware that whenever
you open a newspaper, or listen to some post-teenage scribbler pontificating
on TV and radio about the state of play in the world of business,
we always hear the same old mantras being mindlessly repeated.
If
business slows, interest rates must be cut and more credit granted.
If
possible the currency must be manipulated lower in value to provide
a tacit form of export subsidy and to impose a subtle kind of import
tariff, at the visible expense of our business partners and commercial
counterparts abroad, but also at the often overlooked one of our
shoppers (and non-exporting business owners) at home who have to
pay more for everything as a result.
Then,
if consumers can’t actually EARN any more money through hard work
and application, they must borrow it and spend it anyway. After
all, the more people save, the poorer they get – at least according
to Keynes’ infamous and highly erroneous concept of a ‘paradox of
thrift’.
Next,
the central bank must do all it can to prevent prices falling, for
that is the evil of ‘deflation’ as it is loosely and wrongly –
termed.
If
all else fails, the government should spend more money than it can
thieve from your pocket (never TOO much of a hardship for the office-hungry
politicos eager to look important and to buy votes). Nor should
it be too fussy about what it spends the money on, as long as it
the money is spent.
All
of this – though unthinkingly accepted by the vast majority of pundits
and policy makers today – is wrong, wrong, wrong – as any housewife
balancing her family budget, or any small business owner trying
to make ends meet would agree if we moved this discussion out of
the realm of that indefinable and often unfathomable concept of
the ‘Economy’ with a large, aggregated ‘E’ and actually applied
a little basic arithmetic and a smattering of clear logic to their
own individual experiences.
Among
the many faults of this approach, it assumes consuming is more important
than producing, as if the rats in the barn do us a favour by making
sure we don’t have any surplus corn left over with which to plant
an extra field or to feed an extra plough horse.
It
also confuses mere money with real wealth and it argues that the
heavy hand of the State has a right to subvert our freely made choices
about how much we save, rather than spend, and that it also has
the right to spend our money for us, in order to shower benefits
on some mythical Collective.
So
what if we were to show you that, here and now, over the fifteen
months since the Spring of 2002, there is a real life example –
not just some theoretical argument – to show that today’s orthodoxy
might just be a busted flush?
Consider
the case of the statistic called Gross Domestic Product – or GDP
– which is so widely bandied about (and often given the misleading
short-hand of ‘growth’, as if simply ringing a cash register more
frequently meant anything was actually being done about improving
our lot in life)
Well,
in poor, benighted Europe, the proportion of GDP which results from
private activity has only edged up 0.7% since March 2002 – and,
as the headlines never cease to remind us, governments there have
not exactly been slow in spending money their citizens don’t have,
especially in the bigger (and sicker) economies.
As
you might also be aware, short-term interest rates in Europe have
been cut to 2% barely positive at all, after you allow for the
impact of generalized price rises on the value of Jacques’, Hans’
and Jan’s money and to what must seem like a waking dream to Juan,
Fabio, Dimitri and Domingo.
Even
in the US, this private GDP datum has only risen 2½% in these same
five quarters (if you trust the rather suspicious price-and-quality
adjustment factors) and then partly because the population will
have grown by around 1pct in the same interval, meaning bread-per-mouth
probably only went up by a dismal 1%1½% in that time.
Again,
a cursory glance at the newspapers will tell you that borrowing
has not been restrained there, either, in the Land of the Free Credit,
thanks to a Federal Reserve which has slashed rates to generational
lows of 1¾% well beneath the ongoing rate of erosion in Hank’s
money!
Check
again and you will see much hand-wringing and gnashing of teeth,
too, about the size of the budget deficit being run up by Dubya-Dubya
III and his minions, a true accounting of which shows that they
are presently overspending by close to two typical ANNUAL family
incomes for EVERY SECOND of the working day!
Over
here in the UK, our £130 billion personal borrowing spree and the
besmirching of Public Prudence’s honour by that music hall villain,
Chancellor Culpability Brown, has seen a gain of just over 2% recorded
since last March, similar in degree to our American suzerain’s performance
But
if you want to know which country has been leaving the three of
these in the dust, it has been that fallen giant, Japan, where non-government
GDP has risen just a smidgeon under 6%, nearly 2½ times as fast
as America and the UK and a long street ahead of Europe.
Moreover,
this growth will have been shared by very few extra people, since
Japan’s population is, if anything falling – a phenomenon widely
bemoaned, but surely a blessing in that overcrowded archipelago.
This
means that ricecakes-per-mouth may well have advanced more than
four times as fast as bagels-per-mouth, stretching the gap across
the Pacific even further.
Now,
given that:
- the trade-weighted
value of the Yen is unchanged over that period (there has
been no currency devaluation)
- that money
supply growth there is the slowest of the four and that
bank lending is indeed contracting (little extra credit is being
created)
- that the
people there save money – and lots of it, the anti-social
HOARDERS!
- that prices
have FALLEN (Gasp! Deflation!)
- and that
government spending has actually gone DOWN (Yes, I know in
Japan, of all places!)
Do you think that perhaps there’s a lesson here to be drawn by Keynesians
everywhere?
Would
you like to bet a croissant to a Courvoisier that none of them do?
September
11, 2003
Sean
Corrigan [send him mail]
writes from London on the financial markets, and edits the daily
Capital Letter
and the Website Capital
Insight. He is co-manager of the Bermuda-based Edelweiss
Fund.
Copyright
© 2003 LewRockwell.com
Sean
Corrigan Archives
|