There
are certain pundits who are inclined to cut Bush a lot of slack.
For instance, these folks say that if it turns out that Iraq really
had no "weapons of mass destruction," hey, well, we knew
all along that that wasn't the real reason we had to pursue
"regime change." No, it was to liberate the Iraqi people. And
should it turn out that the Iraqi people don't actually feel they
have been liberated? Well, then we went to war because it was
in our strategic interests to eliminate Hussein's government.
But
Andrew Sullivan recently has made a strong, perhaps unbeatable,
claim to the title of "Chief Bush Slack Cutter." Other administration
apologists have generally regarded the ongoing guerilla warfare
in Iraq as an unfortunate consequence of a necessary war. Some
have blamed the US for bungling the "post-war" administration
of the country, dampening the initial enthusiasm of the Iraqi
people at being freed of Hussein. Others have attributed the problems
to the fact that many of Hussein's troops did not directly confront
the US during the "war phase" of the war, allowing them to slip
away and fight a guerilla war.
Sullivan
puts such wankers paltry faith in George Bush to shame. He has
discerned the real reason for the ongoing turmoil in Iraq: It's
all a part of the administration's plan to win the war on terror!
As he wrote recently in his blog:
This
is an interesting strategy, sort of like why I wander around in
the woods on humid days wearing no bug repellent: It draws those
darned mosquitoes out, where I can tackle them in the open.
But
what of the many Iraqis who would not have considered taking up
arms against the US, except for the increasingly brutal occupation
of their country by a foreign army, the lack of water and electricity,
the 2:00 AM, warrantless raids on their homes to confiscate weapons
that are legally theirs, and their innocent relatives accidentally
killed by US troops? That seems a bit more like breeding
mosquitoes rather than simply drawing existing ones into the open.
Well,
quite clearly, such people were all potential terrorists!
After all, the fact that they could be prompted to attack US troops
demonstrates this all by itself, doesn't it? So, by our occupation
of Iraq, we not only "draw terrorists out of the woodwork," we
also are able to find out who the potential terrorists are, and
get them out of that darned woodwork as well. And if the reservoir
of potential terrorists turns out to be a good portion of the
population of Iraq? Well, it's better to find out now, isn't it?
Now,
some of you might still resist the force of Mr. Sullivan's logic.
"Wait a second," you ask, "if this was the administration's strategy,
shouldn't it have at least told us? What about those statements
that we weren't going to occupy Iraq, just liberate it? And wouldn't
it have been decent to have informed the troops, who had thought
they'd be back with their family in a couple of months, that actually
they would be spending years serving as terrorist bait?" After
all, if they are going to be human "flypaper," as Sullivan calls
them in another blog entry, they might have wanted to know what
they were getting into.
Clearly,
you whiners have not yet achieved Sullivan's deep appreciation
of the strategic brilliance of President Bush. If you're going
to trick terrorists into coming to pick off a few of our troops
every day, you can't tell them it's a trap now, can you? If they
knew they were being duped into plugging
US soldiers in the neck with a bullet, they'd never fall for
it.
Bush
has this all under control. If a dirty nuke, made from the material
stolen, in the wake of the war, from Iraq's unguarded nuclear
facilities, goes off in Los Angeles or Boston, well, that draws
a few more terrorists out of the woodwork, doesn't it? Plus, it
tricks them into using up their radioactive material! The residents
who die should be satisfied in knowing that it was all part of
the plan.
As
Sullivan says, "Under this president, we mean to win." So, if
the administration is feeding us a line of crap, our job is to
pipe down and swallow it. After all, you aren't some sort of traitor,
are you?