Cargo Cult Economics
by
David Calderwood
by David Calderwood
DIGG THIS
In a recent
email exchange about our larger social situation Robert Klassen
used a term that simply jumped off the computer screen at me.
Cargo Cult.
It may not
hit you the same way, but it sure raised the wattage of the lights
in my world. I turned to Wikipedia for a few details and didn’t
need to even page down to see all that I needed.
Members,
leaders, and prophets of cargo cults maintain that the manufactured
goods ("cargo") of the non-native culture have been
created by spiritual means, such as through their deities and
ancestors, and are intended for the local indigenous people, but
that, unfairly, the foreigners have gained control of these objects
through attraction of these material goods to themselves by malice
or mistake.
Now let me
rewrite that passage from the standpoint of politicians, reporters,
most academic economists, executive branch administrators, and quite
a few heads of corporations:
Members,
leaders, and prophets of the government-regulated economy cults
maintain that the manufactured goods (productive economy) of the
Free Market have been created by spiritual or ideological means
(Gaia or egalitarian socialism/Keynesian-monetarist policy, respectively),
and are intended for the cult’s members, but that, unfairly, the
Free-Market capitalists have gained control of these objects through
attraction of this wealth to themselves by malice and greed.
Like Cargo
Cultists in New Guinea, truly these people don’t know any better.
Even highly placed and widely quoted professional economists are
as ignorant of the source of economic wealth as were stone age tribesmen
whose first contact with technology was with people landing airplanes
in the jungle.
The cultists’
spending on (or cheering for) the bailouts, stimulus payments, and
infrastructure "investments" is based on the belief that
it is money that causes economic prosperity, just like cargo cultists
thought that if they built straw models of airplanes and recreated
airstrips the "cargo" would return.
When I go to
the store to buy something with money, the only reason I have money
to spend is because someone paid me to produce what it is
I do at work. My job lasts only so long as I produce in value for
my employer more than I cost to employ, and my job’s security exists
only so long as my employer’s production is profitable.
As I see it,
it is production that makes the human world go around and supports
our wonderful standard of living. Money is a useful accounting of
that production, unless fraud is involved (e.g. fractional reserve
banking and central bank operations as a whole).
Why do Cargo
Cult Economists cling so tightly to the notion that spending alone
can solve the problems of the day?
I think part
of the answer is that they have no way to define productivity. Instead
of seeing productivity as action that yields something that can
be sold profitably on the free market, they appear to cling to the
Labor Theory of Value where labor alone defines value produced.
They seem to
think that all it takes to make a job is a worker and someone to
pay him. If no employer stands ready to do so, the manager of a
government program can hire him to dig a ditch and fill it in. A
job is a job.
In the news
recently was an employee sit-in at defunct Republic Windows in Chicago.
The company lost its credit line from Bank of America and a major
investor recently wrote
off a twelve million dollar investment in the company as valueless.
The employees
are demanding severance and accrued vacation pay as mandated by
federal law. Apparently unbeknownst to them, their work was producing
nothing of value, defined as things sold at a profit. The
company produced losses, not profits, which revealed that anyone
working there was engaged in unproductive work, no matter how many
windows they made.
Politicians
with the state of Illinois and city of Chicago threatened to end
their business ties with Bank of America if the bank didn’t somehow
help the employees get what they wanted. In this microcosm we see
that membership in Cargo Cult Economics is nearly universal. Jobs
aren’t endeavors that produce economically viable goods and services,
they’re just something that takes up time, requires some kind of
effort, and results in a paycheck. All that matters is work, not
that what is produced is economically viable. The idiotic Labor
Theory of Value is clearly part and parcel of Cargo Cult Economics.
Spending on
make-work jobs and economically non-viable production generates
nothing but waste. It wastes the money of those people taxed (extorted)
to pay for it and it wastes the time of those doing the work when
they should be out developing new skills in other jobs that, when
so employed, produce profits. Such spending also steals money
from the suppliers of goods and services taxpayers would have preferred
to purchase; society as a whole gets poorer with every cycle.
Instead of
progress we get regress.
Welcome to
Obamanomics, a sect of the Keynesian denomination of Cargo Cult
Economics.
All the spending
in the world will not change economic fact. If the Big Three carmakers
are not able to produce their products at a profit, they are already
dead. Reanimating them will not preserve jobs, it will only put
off the painful adjustments while destroying the very wealth needed
to rebuild in new industries. If they go bankrupt then their valuable
assets will be acquired by someone else who will try to produce
cars at a profit. A lot of people will lose their jobs, but that
is already unavoidable. People were lured into blind alleys of work
by sirens singing songs full of false promises. Those sirens mostly
receive government paychecks, and are Cargo Cult Economists to the
core.
Near the beginning
of the 21st century we collectively suffer from painfully
incorrect theory that sewed crippling economic weakness into the
fabric of our world for over 100 years. Government interference
yielded a vast invisible wasteland of nonviable businesses, corrupt
money, and misallocated capital including people who now perform
work that is the equivalent of digging a hole and then filling it
in. Though many of us invested college degrees and/or decades in
developing our skills, nothing will change the fact that there is
no useful application of those skills in many organizations as they
exist. Now that the accumulated weight of all these errors has triggered
the avalanche of collapse, no intervention will stop inviolable
economic law from revealing what is real and what was mirage.
A
whole lot of jobs are going to disappear, and a whole lot of us
are going to have our lives disrupted, and there’s nothing we can
do but wish for it to occur swiftly so those of us who are displaced
can correctly analyze the new conditions and make the best of our
skills or acquire new ones.
Unfortunately,
no effort succeeds in breaking the cultists’ beliefs in palpably
wrong theory. Even as their actions yield desert in place of verdant
fields, they redouble their efforts like 18th century
physicians opening another vein when the initial bleeding of the
patient didn’t cure their infection.
There’s little
we can do except poke ridicule at these cultists and their silly
antics. They’re in charge, and they have armies of citizens
who fervently want to believe that those antics will cause prosperity
to resume raining
from the sky.
Get free of
debt and prepare for a long economic winter. Hibernation may be
best.
December 11, 2008
David
Calderwood [send him mail]
a businessman, artist, and author of the novel Revolutionary
Language, selected January 2000 Freedom Book of the Month
at Free-market.net.
Copyright
© 2008 by David C. Calderwood
David
Calderwood Archives
|