What Gives?
by
David Calderwood
by David Calderwood
DIGG THIS
So here we
are, bouncing off a ten percent decline in the Dow 30 Industrial
Average, and the clear-eyed among us are scratching our heads.
Nothing has
changed, the real estate market is a submarine with its dive claxon
sounding, the dislocations of surging gold and oil have everyone
jittery, and just when it seems the bottom is about to drop out,
we see Wall Street ignite the booster rockets and head for the sky.
How can it
be? Rear-end deep in alligators, the folks who are active in the
stock market strap on their party hats and announce a bottom by
issuing Buy Orders?
There can only
be one explanation: It’s a conspiracy!
Just kidding.
The truth is
probably more pedestrian. No market-driven phenomenon moves in one
direction forever. Each trend has a lifespan, and when it is reached
the trend reverses, usually when continuing the trend seems most
sure. As Lew suggested in his recent
column, even the trend toward credit creation must someday reverse,
otherwise we would be forced to conclude that the alchemists running
the Fed, Treasury, and Wall Street had actually invented their long-desired
perpetual motion machine.
Our challenge
has always been to assess whether it is This Time that the reversal
is the Big One. People who spend a lot of time analyzing these things
could easily have concluded that any of the market tops of the past
20 years was the zenith of credit creation silliness. Those who
acted on those assumptions were mercilessly punished by reality,
however. It’s truly painful to arrange ones finances to weather
a storm that never arrives, watching the least informed around you
reap fantastic rewards as the surreal party of credit expansion
gets even more raucous.
Been there,
did that, bought the t-shirt (you wouldn’t believe the price).
The stock market
decline during 2000 and 2001 panicked the moneyed elite and they
responded like so many of Pavlov’s dogs. To a Fed with only one
tool, the hammer of credit creation, every problem looks like a
nail. To carry the analogy, it doesn’t matter that the problem they
faced was the result of using the hammer in the first place.
My unusual
view is that the trend toward declining stock prices would have
ended about where it did regardless of what the Fed did, but like
most things in history that’s an untestable hypothesis.
Either way,
what I think was the final, manic creation of credit ran its course
until lenders were pushing newly created credit at any body that
was still warmer than room temperature. I’m surprised that the recent
crop of zombie movies didn’t include a scene where the walking dead
qualified for a home loan…everyone else did. Credit was created
until the gluttony almost ruptured the stomachs of lender and borrower
alike.
Conditions
that occurred the past five years were both unprecedented and extremely
unlikely to repeat. The ability to repackage weak debt and get it
rated AAA is gone, not to return until after those with burned fingers
today are retired or dead.
With 13-week
T-bill rates hovering around 3.25% this week and an effective Fed
Funds rate at about 4.5%, it’s a foregone conclusion that the
Fed will continue its recent actions and lower its target interest
rates. A chart of T-bill rates vs. Fed Funds rates shows that the
Fed follows the market-driven rates of T-bills, not the other way
around. A trend toward lower T-bill rates (and lower Fed rates)
simply implies a desire for lower risk, hardly a boon for stocks.
The pundits’ obsession with the Fed Funds rate is simply another
illustration of irrationality.
The world is
awash in dollar credits. Either holders of dollar credits can sell
them for other currency credits, a process that appears to have
already occurred as the price for dollars on world markets collapsed
all year long, buy commodities (hence the fantastic rallies in gold
and oil in dollar terms) or they can bring all those dollar credits
back here to the USA and use them to buy up all the things Americans
have pawned in order to maintain their profligate spending. This
latter is tantamount to a lender taking possession of depreciating
assets of an insolvent borrower. At some point even a few cents
on the dollar is better than nothing.
I think this
is what we’re seeing with the purchases of US corporate assets by
foreign individuals and funds. It seems to me, however, that these
Sovereign Wealth Funds that are awash in dollars are the last place
to expect salvation.
These
funds are government owned and managed. It’s like giving some state
bureaucracy a bunch of money and expecting them to wisely
manage it. I think there’s a good chance that these funds will
be the last suckers to the party. If we have excess credit drowning
the world, the solution is for that credit to drain away. Among
many ways for this to occur, the use of that credit to purchase
assets just in time for those assets to decline hard seems like
a great way to retire the Fed’s excesses. Another is default, and
we’re seeing that in spades among weak real estate borrowers.
None of us
know for sure what exactly the future will bring. We can only make
educated guesses, but the stars do seem poised to line up for an
end to the long period of credit creation. Lots of nervous people
are watching the recent stock market lows. If that floor is broken
fear may finally overwhelm greed. Either way I doubt the market
process, involving the greed and fear of billions of people, is
susceptible to the petty manipulation of a few arrogant men.
In the meantime,
don’t bet what you can’t afford to lose. Pull up a chair, pop some
corn and get ready to watch the next phase in the Clowns’ Parade
that is human history.
December 1, 2007
David
Calderwood [send him
mail] a businessman, artist, and author of the novel Revolutionary
Language, selected January 2000 Freedom Book of the Month
at Free-market.net.
Copyright
© 2007 by David C. Calderwood
David
Calderwood Archives
|