The Manichean Battle Over Sonia Sotomayor
by Charles A. Burris
by Charles A. Burris
A recent editorial
in The Washington Times, "A
Judge Too Far," concerning President Obama's nomination of Judge
Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court perceptively observed:
"Judge Sotomayor
seems to think that inherent racial and sexual differences are
not simply quirks of genetics, but make some better than others.
Consider her 2002 speech at the University of California-Berkeley
School of Law:
"I would
hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences
would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white
male who hasn't lived that life," she said. "I simply do not know
exactly what that difference will be in my judging. But I accept
there will be some based on my gender and my Latina heritage."
"She also
accepted as potentially valid the idea that the "different perspectives"
of "men and women of color" are due to "basic differences in logic
in reasoning" due to "inherent physiological or cultural differences."
The great Austrian
economist Ludwig von Mises, mentor of Congressman Ron Paul and economist/historian
Murray Rothbard, discussed this Marxist nonsense in his magnum opus,
Human Action, under the category of polylogism.
This is
the bogus idea that the logical structure of the mind is different
based on one's class, race, ethnicity, national origin, gender,
sexual preference, etc.
This skewed
Marxist concept lies at the root of all "politically correct" notions
of cultural relativism and multiculturalism fashionable in academia,
the elite media, and critical legal theory circles today.
And if President
Obama has his way, upon the highest court in the land.
This is more
than the widely-accepted idea that our various life experiences
shape our world view, or influence our value judgments in making
ethical and moral decisions.
Again, polylogism
specifically holds that the logical structure of the mind is different
based on one's class, race, nationality, gender, sexual preference,
etc. There is no objective reality independent from these fixed
determinative factors of causality.
The notion
of a Constitutionally-driven independent judicial temperament or
impartiality becomes impossible.
All we have
left is "sociological jurisprudence" which was (is) an attempt to
get away as far as possible from the Framers' original intent of
the Constitution, and to adopt the doctrine of "the Living Constitution"
shaped by socioeconomic causal factors.
It was one
of the bogus concepts to come out of the so-called Progressive Era
a hundred years ago and has eroded our legal system in ways beyond
belief.
Another way
to look at it, it's the old Marxist concept of "the
sociology of knowledge" applied to law and public policy.
Marxism as
a rationale for state aggrandizement and empire (as in the former
Soviet Union) may be dead but as an ideological prop it is very
much alive in such widely-accepted notions as multiculturalism,
"cultural imperialism," sociological jurisprudence, and environmentalism.
Here is an
article by a prominent "Progressive Democrat" who precisely
articulates in his defense of Obama's nomination of Sonia Sotomayor
all the things I mention above.
He sees the
"conservative" attack on Sotomayor as an attack on Obama, upon the
social concept of "empathy" at the heart of progressivism, upon
the notion of "sociological jurisprudence" as the basis of progressive
legal theory (although he doesn't employ the specific term) as opposed
to "strict construction" or the original intent of the Framers in
formulating the Constitution.
This author
uses all the pejorative Bogey man names (Dick Cheney, G. Gordon
Liddy, Newt Gingrich, etc.) to stir up progressives to see this
battle as a Manichean struggle between the angelic forces of light
and the satanic forces of darkness (in a sanitized, secular humanist
sense, of course).
But he can't
let outdated "God language" tarnish his post-Enlightenment, modernist
or progressive exposition. Only reactionaries resort to such antiquated
terminology.
There is much
more to this fight than whether Sonia Sotomayor is confirmed.
Her nomination
is a key battle in the on-going Culture
War which lies at the heart of what America is all about.
June
3, 2009
Charles
A. Burris [send him mail]
is a history instructor in an American high school.
Copyright
© 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Charles
A. Burris Archives
|