'Comrade Wolf' and the Mullahs
by
Patrick
J. Buchanan
by
Patrick J. Buchanan
In the 27 years
since the Iranian Revolution, the United States has launched air
strikes on Libya, invaded Grenada, put Marines in Lebanon and run
air strikes in the Bekaa Valley and Chouf Mountains in retaliation
for the Beirut bombing.
We invaded
Panama, launched Desert Storm to liberate Kuwait and put troops
into Somalia. Under Clinton, we occupied Haiti, fired cruise missiles
into Sudan, intervened in Bosnia, conducted bombing strikes on Iraq
and launched a 78-day bombing campaign against Serbia, a nation
that never attacked us. Then, we put troops into Kosovo.
After the
Soviet Union stood down in Eastern Europe, we moved NATO into Poland
and the Baltic states and established U.S. bases in former provinces
of Russia's in Central Asia.
Under Bush
II, we invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, though it appears Saddam neither
had weapons of mass destruction nor played a role in 9-11.
Yet, in
this same quarter century when the U.S. military has been so busy
it is said to be overstretched and exhausted, Iran has invaded not
one neighbor and fought but one war: an eight-year war with Iraq
where she was the victim of aggression. And in that war of aggression
against Iran, we supported the aggressor.
Hence,
when Iran says that even as we have grievances against her, she
has grievances against us, does Iran not have at least a small point?
And when Russian President Putin calls Bush's America "Comrade Wolf,"
does he not have at least a small patch of ground on which to stand?
Which brings
me to the point. There is no reason to believe Iran wants war with
us. If she did want war with America, she could have had it any
time in the last 27 years. If she did want war with America, all
the old ayatollah had to do was continue holding those American
hostages after Ronald Reagan raised his right hand. He didn't. As
Reagan recited the oath, the hostages were clearing Iranian air
space.
In all
those years, Iran has never attacked the United States and has been
tied to but one terror attack against us: the Khobar Towers 10 years
ago. No evidence has been found that Iran had any role in 9-11,
the first attack on the World Trade Center, the suicide attack on
the U.S.S. Cole or the embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania.
Comes the
reply. Iran was almost surely behind the bombing of the U.S. embassy
and Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983 and the hostage-taking of
the Reagan era. Iran supports Hezbollah and Hamas and plotted the
bombing of the Jewish community center in Buenos Aires, and Herr
Ahmadinejad routinely promises the eradication of Israel.
But if
he wants a war with Israel, he could have it tomorrow by launching
rockets. If he wants war with America, Bush and Cheney will accommodate
him. He has done neither.
Ahmadinejad
is behaving like a man provoking us to hit him, but not too hard,
so he can play the "victim" of U.S. "aggression" without winding
up in the hospital or the morgue.
For while
Iran's regime might benefit from heroically enduring U.S. strikes
to destroy its nuclear facilities none of which is near producing
atom-bomb material a major war would be a disaster for Iran.
Not only would the regime be denuded of modern weapons, it would
be set back decades to where the Arabs, Azeris, Baluchis and Kurds
might try to break the country up, even as Iraq is breaking up.
But this
would be a disaster for the United States as well. For an attack
on Iran would unify Persians in hatred of America, the way Pearl
Harbor unified Americans. And a breakup of Iran could create a new
archipelago of terrorist training camps across the Middle East.
What
we are getting at is that there is common ground between the United
States and Iran. Neither of us would benefit from a major war. Both
of us benefit if there is a reliable flow of oil and gas out of
the Gulf and Central Asia. Neither of us wants to see the return
of the Taliban or rise of al-Qaida, which is anti-Shiite. In his
18-page letter, Ahmadinejad powerfully condemned the massacre of
9-11.
And Tehran
must be having second thoughts about whether to go nuclear when
that could mean Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Egypt might follow suit,
and the United States and Israel would put a hair trigger on their
missile arsenals, and target them on Tehran.
Better
to talk. To test the waters, President Bush might take up Ahmadinejad's
missive, manifest the same respect for Islam that he showed for
Jesus of Nazareth, rebut his attacks on America and lay down what
Bush would like to see in a future relationship with Iran.
We have
much to talk about: terror, nuclear power, Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine,
oil, what we owe Iran and what Iran owes us.
May
12, 2006
Patrick
J. Buchanan [send
him mail] is co-founder and editor of The
American Conservative. He is also the author of seven books,
including Where
the Right Went Wrong, and A
Republic Not An Empire.
Copyright
© 2006 Creators Syndicate
Patrick
J. Buchanan Archives
|