My Own Son!
by
Bill Bonner
by Bill Bonner
If
we have a global boom, which countries are likely to benefit the
most? The fast-moving Asian countries, says Marc Faber in Barron's.
If we have a global bust, which companies are likely to get hurt
the least? The low-priced Asian producers, he continues. Asian companies
are selling for prices that are lower than they were in 1990. If
the Dow were back to 1990 levels, it would be priced below 2400.
Buy
land in India, Faber concludes.
Or
how about a hospital management company in Thailand that yields
5%? Try Bangkok Dusit Medical Services.
We
hear bells ringing.
First,
our oldest son called from Florida. Could we lend him some money
so he could buy a house not far from the inter-coastal canal, he
wanted to know. Prices are soaring...he is sure he'll make a killing.
He can't imagine that prices can go down they've gone nowhere
but up since he was born.
Second,
from the Christian Science Monitor comes news that real estate
is "one of the hottest curriculums on college campuses." NYU is
said to have 5,000 people signed up for its Real Estate Institute.
Third,
the insiders are selling. Barron's reports that the CEO of Lennar,
one of the largest homebuilders in the nation, just sold a big slug
of shares pocketing more than $5 million. He may have sold the
shares because he is sending his boy to NYU's Real Estate Institute.
Or maybe his son asked for a loan. But he's not selling them because
he thinks they're going up.
Marc
Faber also considers the homebuilders a "sell."
Wanna
buy something that will go up? Buy gold...or Newmont Mining. When
change does come breaking down the door...people will want gold
to protect themselves. Oil would be a good by too maybe not this
year, but sometime soon. The world is set up to use cheap oil. But
the cheap oil has nearly all been pumped already. Oil should hit
$100 a barrel before the end of this decade. And what else? Oh yes...food!
In the last 20 years, world grain production rose only 25%, but
as people particularly in Asia grow richer, they want to eat
more meat. And you can't produce more meat without a lot more grain.
Inventories peaked out 18 years ago and are now less than half the
level of 1987. And nearly all the grains are selling at very low
prices 20-year lows, in fact.
Another
long-suffering correspondent:
"Gold
has its virtues and fiat money its dangers. But your argument is
a tad simplistic.
"Since
at least the 1920's our economy has been driven by consumption,
and to use the supply of any substance, gold included, as an artificial
constraint on productive capacity is an act of sheer lunacy in a
consumption driven society.
"It
is much like the battle of Isandlwana Mountain in the Anglo-Zulu
war. Legend has it that the quartermasters for the right and left
sides of the battle line had ended up on the left and right sides
of that same battle line. Rather than issue ammunition to the troops
near them, the quartermasters insisted on having the ammunition
passed the length of the battle line to their own troops. This slowed
down the receipt of ammunition and diverted the attention of soldiers
being massacred to unnecessary transportation issues. The troops
were killed almost to a man, but at least the quartermasters would
have been able to account for their distribution of ammunition according
to the most stringent army standards if any of them had survived!
"Now
a consumption driven society at this point in history probably represents
lunacy itself, but artificial restrictions on productive capacity
will not get rid of this lunacy. They will simply result in widespread
poverty
and wars."
We
offer a note of clarification. We do not propose gold backing as
a solution to the world's many money issues. We only propose it
as a solution to OUR OWN money issues. In other words, we see no
reason why the world should go to war simply because we have stashed
a few gold louis in our backyard.
More
reader mail:
"I
personally think that McDonald's should counter sue the children's
parents for negligence. They neglected as their parental duty to
ensure that their children grew up healthy. Due to their laziness,
they failed to provide healthy, nutritious food, so instead of taking
the time to shop for and prepare wholesome dishes, they took the
easy way out by piling their children in the car and pulling up
to the drive-thru or bellying up to the counter to order a few Big
Macs. As a former food service industry worker and manager, I still
take offense to people blaming the food. I cannot remember one instance
when Ronald McDonald or the Hamburglar drug anyone into the store
and force-fed him or her. I have worked for more than one restaurant
chain, and no matter which one I was employed at, never has there
been an instance of force-feeding any member of the public.
"When
my son was a teenager and started frequenting McDonalds by himself,
I reprimanded him about eating healthy, he reminded me that he had
been raised to make good choices, and most of the time ordered a
salad. Children will practice what you preach, as long as you practice
what you preach. I personally think that if we are going to go forth
with this litigious society, then the Pediatrics Association of
America ought to require all pediatricians to report parents of
overweight children for child abuse and neglect. I think they should
be required to attend nutrition classes, and if they are overweight
themselves, they should be required to lose weight as an example
to their children. If they or their children fail to lose weight,
they should be trotted off to fat camps at their own expense.
"How
big do we want our government to be? And if I sound outraged and
sarcastic, it is because I am so tired of people not wanting to
be responsible for their own actions. This entitlement mentality
has got to stop."
February
3, 2005
Bill
Bonner [send
him mail] is the author, with Addison Wiggin, of Financial
Reckoning Day: Surviving the Soft Depression of The 21st
Century.
Copyright
© 2005 LewRockwell.com
Bill
Bonner Archives
|