Nature’s
Gifts to the Old
by
Bill Bonner
by Bill Bonner
"If
youth but knew...if age but could." ~ Henri Estienne
Nature in her
majesty gives few gifts to the old. They are taken over by disease
and exploited by politicians and door-to-door fundraisers, which
is to say, they are plagued by parasites. But an old fellow has
an edge here and there. He doesn't have to buy long-term insurance
or top quality carpeting; there's no point in owning things that
will last longer than he will. And here in London, if he looks decrepit
enough, he can sometimes get a seat on the subway. In the financial
world, the geezers have another advantage: they've been around long
enough to know better.
But Nature
grants her favors grudgingly, even in financial matters. There are
some markets where even experience is a liability, not an asset.
Adam Smith (a nom de plume) wrote about the "Great Garbage Market"
of the late '60s on Wall Street. He noticed that shares were such
bad bargains that the old timers wouldn't buy them. Only young investors
– those too naïve or too dumb to know what they were doing
– would buy. So, the wily graybeards put the youngsters in charge
of the funds. And the funds soared...until they crashed. After 1968,
Wall Street went down, in real terms, for the next 14 years.
The Dow fell
184 points yesterday. All 30 Dow stocks were down. An investor with
enough steel in his hair (if he still has any hair) would remember
the period following 1966. It looked then, as it does now, as though
stocks had peaked. But inflation was increasing, disguising what
was really going on in the stock market. In nominal terms, stocks
refused to go down. In 1968, the Dow even hit a new high. The youngsters
came to believe that high prices were not just cyclical, but eternal.
They had no experience with inflation, nor with a bear market. Of
course, the markets were about to teach them a lesson. And they
paid for their tuition, dearly. In real terms, stocks went down
by nearly 80% until the next bull cycle began in 1982.
Generally,
age and sagacity pay off in investment markets. Cycles can run for
a long time. Longer than you can remain solvent, warned Lord Keynes.
Maybe longer than you can remain alive, we add. Occasionally, during
bubble periods particularly, what is called for is youth and witlessness;
in other words, something of a redundancy. This was the case in
the share market in the late '90s. Who but a reckless neophyte would
buy a dot.com with no earnings, no business plan, and no clue? Many
people did. And then, they doubled their money as the silly thing
soared! Who but a callow newcomer would buy un-built condos in Florida,
expecting to flip them to a greater fool before the lights went
on? Many people did, and they, too, plucked money off the trees...for
a while.
In fact, according
to the latest figures, the young whipper-flippers in the real estate
market may still be making money, but barely. According to figures
from California, property prices rose 10% in the last 12 months
even though there were also large increases in inventories and large
decreases in sales. Sales actually fell 21.4% during the same period.
How can prices
rise while buyers disappear? Well, housing markets do not clear
like a trading pit in Chicago. Owners are reluctant to believe that
they can't get their prices. They hold. They wait. They hope. Inventories
of unsold houses increase. Here we have yet another version of the
Law of Limp. Speculators may be jacking up prices with lightning
speed on their properties, but they drag their feet bringing them
back down. But unlike the phony legerdemain of the centrally controlled
dollar or the phony bookkeeping of federal finances, the market
for housing is broad and real. It can be ignored, for a while, but
it can never be denied. When sales decline and prices rise, something
has to give. Either the inventory is gradually cleared away so that
tighter supplies can support higher prices, or prices fall. What
will happen in California? Will the youthful speculators win their
bet? Will prices continue to climb? Or, will the grumpy contrarians
finally be proven right?
We can't say
for sure. But we have a feeling that it is time for the kids to
take a beating. As many as 40% of the houses bought last year were
second houses – meant either for vacation or investment. That is
a lot of houses to carry in anticipation of a quick resale. As the
teaser rates on new mortgages kick out, and taxes, condo fees and
other costs kick in, our guess is that our youthful speculators
are going to get a kick in the pants.
The youthful
speculators in the financial markets might be in for painful derrieres
as well. Last week, we had to laugh out loud at our own magazine.
MoneyWeek included a profile of a 32-year-old fund manager
in London, said to be a "born stock picker." At that age, he was
only eight years old when the last bull market in shares and bonds
began. The bear market that preceded it started six years before
he was born. He was only 13 when Alan Greenspan took over at the
Fed. He was only 16 when the Japanese market started to tank. And
he was only 18 when George Bush the elder vomited on the Japanese
prime minister.
Still, his
fund has gone up nearly 150% in the last three years. And you can't
argue with success, can you? "Investors could be forgiven for thinking
that their money would be better placed with a more experienced
manager," said the article, in a bit of understatement. But when
we raised the issue with the staff writer, he protested: "Wait a
minute, at 32 years old, he's probably about average age for fund
managers." Probably true. Which made us wonder: What kind of a market
is this? Is it a garbage market, suitable only for kids, hustlers
and mental defectives? Or, is it a serious market for serious investors?
As usual, we
don't have an answer, but we have a feeling. It's the same one that
comes to us after missing lunch, or looking at a chart of bond yields.
Our feeling is that the long period of falling interest rates is
over. For the next long period, which could last 20 or 30 years,
money will be harder to come by; real rates will be headed higher,
which will mean the bubble days may be over. The codgers may get
another chance to say, "I told you so."
• Gold fell
in overseas trading on Monday, below our target price of $650. Then
on Tuesday, it bounced back. Is it time to buy? Is this the best
price we're going to get? Maybe. Personally, we are waiting to see
how this correction develops. If gold shoots back up, we will have
missed a fine buying opportunity. If it drops down to $600, we will
have an even better one. Take your chances. Buy on dips. Be happy.
• Now, the
LA Times has decided to take a look at CEO compensation.
In a study of 100 large California companies, the paper found that
executive compensation has risen to 6.6% of net income. Why would
shareholders give so much of their money away? We venture an answer:
It is late in the game and because they are not really capitalists.
They are but pseudo-capitalists...capitalist wannabe's...lumpencapitalists.
They have let themselves be out-maneuvered by the managers they
employ. Instead of properly exploiting the working classes, the
new "mass capitalists" are being gouged by their managers. Shame.
• It is the
last day of May. We recall, for no apparent reason, Mays past. At
Owensville Elementary school in Southern Maryland the little girls
would put on white dresses with garlands in their hair and dance
around the maypole. For those who don't remember it, the maypole
was a tall lean mast erected in the playground. Paper streamers
of white and red were attached at the top. As the music played,
the girls would skip around, half to the left the other half to
right, weaving in an out, so that the maypole itself was finally
entirely wrapped up. Then, the girls would switch directions to
unbraid it. The dance has ancient roots somewhere in the British
Isles, we are told. It is a pagan festival, probably celebrating
the arrival of good weather (perhaps the weather was better back
then) and probably accompanied by lascivious, licentious behavior
that wouldn't be tolerated today, at least not outside a private
club with an admission fee.
Charming
little Owensville Elementary, with its wooden walls, shingle sidings,
and six tiny classrooms has vanished. During the 1960s and 1970s,
education was centralized into large buildings of cement, steel
and glass...with ideas and methods every bit as drab and clunky.
Now, we imagine, there are metal detectors at the entrance, drug
counselors, and professional educators. The maypoles are gone, too,
or so we've heard. They were considered too retrograde, too cute,
too innocent, too European. Enlightened school boards have decided
to emphasize other things, things thought to be more relevant and
socially redeeming, such as multiculturalism, recycling, and sex
hygiene.
And
now, our own take on a thought from a dead man, G. K. Chesterton:
All centralized
systems mean the rule of the few; and educational machinery is among
the most centralized of all systems. If the modern American really
wants to know what his fathers meant by democracy, he will never
learn it in school. He must make the supreme and awful sacrifice.
He must get out and think.
June
1, 2006
Bill
Bonner [send
him mail] is the author, with Addison Wiggin, of Financial
Reckoning Day: Surviving the Soft Depression of The 21st
Century and
Empire of Debt: The Rise Of An Epic Financial Crisis.
Copyright
© 2006 Bill Bonner
Bill
Bonner Archives
|