The Best Thing About Money
by
Bill Bonner
by Bill Bonner
"It
is strange, I mean the way things work out," said a guest at dinner
last night. "It seems like a kind of madness wanders around the
globe. While, here in Europe, we were trying to batter each others'
brains out, you, in America, were smart. You were sitting back and
taking orders. Now you're the ones who have gone mad."
Our
guest had described the world of the 19th and 20th century the
days when the idea of an American empire was still repugnant and
absurd. While wars, revolutions, pogroms, stormed over Europe and much of the rest of the world America kept to itself, reluctant
to get involved. Attractive new ideas popped up all over Europe
like poisonous mushrooms. But, for the most part, Americans kept
their heads. Most went about their business seeking happiness
in their own private ways...trying to get rich. "The business of
America is business," Calvin Coolidge explained.
Money
isn't everything, we suddenly recalled. Lusting after wealth is
not always becoming, not always rewarding, rarely flattering or
dignified. There is something vulgar about the hustle a real business
needs...like sweat-stains on a starched shirt or a cold cup of coffee
and stubbed out cigarettes. A man who wants to make a real fortune
usually has to grub for it; it's hard to be elegant or refined when
you're scratching for cash or market share. But grubbing for money
is still better than a lot of other things men do. What follows
is a long, rambling reflection on what the lust for money is better
than.
First,
we pause to deliver a shocking update.
People
love myth, fraud and claptrap especially when it flatters them.
Maybe their food, life expectancy, crime rates, transportation,
liquor, women, and architecture are nothing to brag about, say Americans
to each other, but when they grub for money, they grub good. "Old
Europe," they say, making a comparison, "is too rigid, fossilized,
hidebound...a museum."
And
yet, even this is a fraud. Despite Laffer's curve, Greenspan's Bubbles,
Friedman's monetarism and Reagan's revolution, the U.S. economy
has done no better than Europe.
This
week's Economist examines the evidence.
Of
course, everybody knows that America grew a lot faster than Europe
over the last 10 years. But the figures, in terms of GDP/person
are very close 2.1% per year for America against 1.8% for Europe.
Take out Germany which has struggled with absorbing its formerly
communist cousins from the East and the two regions are exactly
the same.
And
productivity? "A study by Kevin Daly, an economist at Goldman Sachs,
finds that, after adjusting for differences in their economic cycles,
trend productivity growth in the euro area has been slightly faster
than that in America over the past 10 years," says the Economist.
What
about jobs? America is the greatest jobs machine on the planet,
right? Again, excluding Germany, "jobs in the rest of the euro area
grew at exactly the same pace as in America," concludes the Economist.
"And since 1997 more jobs have been created in the euro area as
a whole; total employment has risen by 8%, compared with 6% in America."
And
get this..."GDP per hour in Germany and France now exceeds that
in America."
It's
true that Americans earn more and spend more than Europeans...but
they work a lot more hours.
"Compare
France with America," the Economist invites. "Between 1970
and 2000, America's GDP per hour worked rose by 38% and average
hours worked per person rose by 26%, so GDP per person increased
64%. French GDP per hour rose by a more impressive 83%, but hours
worked per person fell 23%.
"Europeans
simply enjoy leisure more," the Economist concludes.
But
what about the "recovery?" Hasn't it been much more vigorous
in America than in Europe?
Well,
only on the surface. Spiked up by the biggest dose of fiscal and
monetary juice in history, America's economy has slightly outpaced
Europe's. But the figures are hard to compare. Europe calculates
GDP growth more conservatively than America...and understates the
truth, rather than overstates it, as they do at the Labor Department.
More importantly, America's jolt of growth has come at great cost.
While Europe got no net stimulus, America has gotten enough to give
it the shakes.
"Super-lax
policies of the past few years have left behind large economic and
financial imbalances that cast doubt on the sustainability of America's
growth," says the Economist. "From a position of surplus
before 2000, the structural budget deficit (including state and
local governments) now stands at almost 5% of GDP, three times as
big as that in the euro area. America has a current-account deficit
of 5% of GDP, while the euro area has a small surplus. American
households now save less than 2% of their disposable income; the
savings rate in the euro area stands at a comfortable 12%. Total
household debt in America mounts to 84% of GDP, compared with only
50% in the euro zone."
Barely
has the 21st century begun and America finds itself in a remarkable
position. It has, what it believes is, the world's most powerful
economy...and the world's most powerful military force. Like the
defunct Soviet Union, it has a sickle in one hand and a hammer in
the other. The sickle, alas, has an awkward bend in it.
"The
U.S. suffers from...structural deficits that will limit the effectiveness
and duration of its crypto-imperial role in the world," explains
Niall Ferguson. "The first is the nation's growing dependence on
foreign capital to finance excessive private and public consumption.
It is difficult to recall any empire that has long endured after
becoming so dependent on lending from abroad."
But
it suffers no deficit of raw power. The hammer U.S. military might is real. Americans are no better or worse than any other race;
is it any wonder they will want to take a whack at someone?
Putting
it another way: grubbing for money might be fine for a modest nation
working its way up in the world; is it worthy of a great nation
on a roll?
"The
trouble with the emphasis in conservatism on the market," William
F. Buckley said to Corey Robin, "is that it becomes rather boring.
You hear it once, you master the idea. The notion of devoting your
life to it is horrifying if only because it's so repetitious. It's
like sex."
Another
old "conservative," Irving Kristol said this to Corey:
"What's the point of being the greatest, most powerful nation in
the world and not having an imperial role?"
"It's
too bad," Kristol lamented about money-grubbing. "I think it would
be natural for the United States...to play a far more dominant role
in world affairs...to command and to give orders as to what is to
be done. People need that."
"When
I think of all the crazy things that went on here in France during
the last century," continued our dinner guest. "Or maybe I should
say in Europe. You know, we invented most of the awful ideas back
then. Deconstructionism, Freudianism, Nazism, Conceptualism, Socialism,
Syndicalism, Minimalism, Communism, Functionalism...come to think
of it almost all the worst ideas came from Europe. And even in America,
if I'm not mistaken, almost all the new developments in philosophy,
art and architecture came from immigrants...or maybe refugees...from
Europe. Just about everything. Of course, most of it was harmless.
Funny even...like Dadaism. But politics wasn't so harmless. And
now you do what we did. You come up with the new ideas...and you
try to force other people to accept them. You have that...what do
they call it...neo-conservatism."
June
28, 2004
Bill
Bonner [send
him mail] is the author, with Addison Wiggin, of Financial
Reckoning Day: Surviving the Soft Depression of The 21st
Century.
Copyright
© 2004 LewRockwell.com
Bill
Bonner Archives
|