The Tyranny of the Living
by
Bill Bonner
by Bill Bonner
Each generation needs to learn the mistakes of their forefathers
for themselves. Though happy to turn on an electric light invented
by a dead man, the living – in love, war, and finance – believe
nothing they haven't seen with their own eyes, except when they
want to.
"Avoid foreign entanglements," cautioned the father of the country.
But corpses have no voice and no vote, neither in markets nor in
politics. George W. Bush is undoubtedly better informed than George
Washington. He may not have the wisdom of a Washington nor the brain,
but at least he has a pulse.
Few people complain about this tyranny of the living. Most accept
it as a fact of life. They would not want people to be excluded
from the pleasures of life because of an accident of birth. But
they are perfectly happy to have the oldest and wisest of our citizens
systematically barred from the polling stations and the trading
floors by the accident of death. The departed shut up forever, leaving
behind them their car keys, their stocks, and their voter registrations
– that is all there is to it. Goodbye and good riddance. It is as
if they had learned nothing useful, noticed nothing, and had no
ideas that might be worth preserving; as if each generation were
smarter than the one that preceded it and every son's thoughts improved
on those of his father.
Oh, progress! Thou art forever making things better, aren't thou?
Throw out the sacred books – what are they, but the thoughts of
dead imbeciles? Forget the old rules, old wives' tales, old traditions
and habits of old generations, old-timers' superstitions, the old
fuddy-duddies' doubts! We are the cleverest humans who have ever
lived, right?
Maybe. But if we could convene a council from the spirit world
and invite the dead to have their say, what would the corpses tell
us? Veni et vidi. Gaze on the dead, and learn their secrets. No
one seems to care about dead people. No stockbrokers ask for their
business. No politicians pander for their votes. No one cares what
they think or what they may have learned before they shucked their
mortal shell.
They get no respect, just a quick send-off, and then they are on
their own. What did the old-timers know of war? Of politics? Of
love? Of money? If only we could ask!
Years ago, investors wanted more from a stock than just the hope
that someone might come along who was willing to pay more for it.
They wanted a stock that paid a dividend out of earnings. When heard
about a stock, they asked: "How much does it pay?" That was what
investing was all about.
But by the 1990s, the old-timers on Wall Street had almost all
died off. Stock buyers no longer cared how much the company earned
or how large a dividend it paid. All they cared about was that some
greater fool would come along and take the stock off their hands
at a higher price. And the fools rushed in. And now the market is
full of greater and greater fools who think the stock market is
there to make them rich. What would the old-timers think of them?
And what would our dead ancestors think of our mortgages? Most
of them had small mortgages, if any at all, on their homes. And
if they had them, they couldn't wait to get rid of them. (Even our
own parents held little parties to celebrate finally paying off
the mortgage on the family home.) What would our forebears think
if they were to learn that the richest generation in American history
has mortgaged a greater share of its homes than any in history?
What would they think of no-money-down mortgages, minimum payment
plans, and negative amortization schedules?
And what would the old-timers think of our government debt? The
unpaid liabilities and obligations, expressed as though they had
to be paid today, come to about $44 trillion, depending on the source
you choose to believe.
And what do the generations of Republicans, now in their graves,
who believed so strongly in balanced budgets for so many years,
think of the republicano in the White House, who has proposed the
most unbalanced budgets in history?
And what about the millions of dead Americans who immigrated to
the United States to find freedom; what do they think of the country
now? They came believing that if they minded their own business,
they would be left alone to do what they wanted. But now, every
pettifogging Pecksniff with a government service (GS) rating is
on their grandchildren's case.
And what about those millions of dead people who scrimped and saved
– who got by on almost nothing – so their children and grandchildren
might live free, prosperous, and independent lives? What would they
think of their descendants, so deep in debt and so dependent on
Asian lenders that they can barely pass a Chinese restaurant without
bending over and kissing the pavement?
Each generation seems to think they are the first to stand upright,
that their mothers and fathers walked on four legs and howled at
the moon! Even when the living feign admiration for same fallen
forebear, it is usually without paying of the least attention to
what the poor schmuck actually said or knew. The dead leave us their
memoirs, their gospels, their histories, and their constitutions
– for what is a constitution but a pact with the dead? – and we
ignore them. We seem to believe that all that they suffered, all
they went through, all the mistakes they made, hold no more interest
for us than a comment by a sunstruck contestant in a TV survival
show: "This is . . . like . . . weird . . ."
A dead man, Edmund Randolph of Virginia, attended the Constitutional
Convention in Philadelphia in 1789. He explained why America needed
a constitution: "The general object was to produce a cure for the
evils under which the United States labored; that in tracing these
evils to their origins, every man had found it in the turbulence
and follies of democracy."
Another dead man, James Madison, made it even clearer: "Democracies,"
he wrote, "have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention;
have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the
rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives
as they have been violent in their death."
So, we leave you "a Republic, if you can keep it," added Ben Franklin.
Well, we couldn't keep it. Now, we have a curious empire, with
a constitution as flexible as its money. Everybody gets a vote in
this new democratic Valhalla. Every halfwit's ballot is worth as
much as George W. Bush's. Every fool and miscreant gets to have
an opinion. Only the dead, are left out. Excluded. Ignored. Forgotten.
It
is as if only the living had opinions worth hearing, as if only
the here and now counted for anything; as if the small, arrogant
oligarchy of those who happen to be walking around had all the answers;
as if the present generation had found the ultimate truth and reached
the end of history.
Your authors have never killed anyone, but we read the obituaries
with approval and interest. We look for the distilled wisdom of
saint and sinner alike. (The editorial pages, by contrast, we read
only for entertainment.)
The
trouble with the news is that it is impossible to know what is important
when you must rely solely on the judgment of people who happen to
be breathing. The living can imagine no problems more urgent than
the ones they confront right now, and no opportunities greater than
the ones right in front of them. We prefer the obituaries.
November
17, 2005
Bill
Bonner [send
him mail] is the author, with Addison Wiggin, of Financial
Reckoning Day: Surviving the Soft Depression of The 21st
Century and
Empire of Debt: The Rise Of An Epic Financial Crisis.
Copyright
© 2005 Bill Bonner
Bill
Bonner Archives
|