<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="Movable Type/3.15" -->
<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>LewRockwell.com Blog</title>
    <link>http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
  
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 00:17:25 -0600</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Is Ron Paul a Blue Meanie?</title>
      <link>http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/021028.html</link>
<author>Lew Rockwell</author>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/05/paulhatesburma.html">Andrew Malcolm</a> of the LA Times political blog thinks Ron has a "mean, vicious, cruel, and uncaring" side for being the only congressman to vote no on a resolution telling Myranmar what to do, but yes on resolutions congratulating US football teams. Now, as an anarchist, I think all this is silly or evil or both, but constitutionally, the internal affairs of Myranmar are none of the congress's business, while American goings-on are. BTW, notice how almost everyone seems to think the US state -- that humanitarian with WMD -- is some sort of charitable enterprise, rather than an imperial regime scheming for global and domestic power. All hail Ron Paul for being the one member of congress to understand this, and to have the courage to do the right thing on these seemingly harmless -- to the LA Times, anyway -- resolutions of potential armed meddling.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>One good thing about Machiavelli...</title>
      <link>http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/021027.html</link>
<author>Ryan W. McMaken</author>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Is the wine named after him. </p>

<p><img alt="machiavelli wine3.JPG" src="http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/machiavelli wine3.JPG" width="354" height="565" /></p>

<p><br />
Otherwise, Niccolo&#769; was pretty much a hypocrite, an opportunist, and a scumbag who has inspired petty tyrants for generations. </p>

<p>This wine however, is obviously a must drink for any political scientist. Like many Americans, I know nothing about wine, so I buy it based on the novelty or charm of the label. This was no exception, although I was pleased with the result. </p>

<p>I'm not a foodie or a wine enthusiast, but I was able to figure out that this is basically a cabernet that certainly was better than the swill wine I usually drink. </p>

<p>I bought this in Machiavelli's sometime home town of Florence where they apparenly have a higher opinion of him than I do. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Lies From the Texas Parasites</title>
      <link>http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/021026.html</link>
<author>Lew Rockwell</author>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The tax-eating child kidnappers are exposed for <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080516/ap_on_re_us/polygamist_retreat">more lies</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Republican Visions of Collectivism</title>
      <link>http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/021025.html</link>
<author>Butler Shaffer</author>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>While all political systems are collectivist in nature, there was at least a time when Republicans could be counted upon - even as they expanded the powers of the state - to speak in individualistic, anti-collectivist words. Apart from a few like Ron Paul, that is no longer the case.  John McCain - over whom most Republicans drool, albeit more like the reflexive excretions of drunks than the emotionally committed - gave an unfocused prognostication of what life would be like after his hypothetical first term as president.  The core of his vision was straight out of the collectivist mindset of Bill Buckley, built around his ideal of "national service."  "True happiness," McCain intoned, "can only be found by serving causes greater than self-interest," and "Americans . . . are sick of the politics of selfishness."</p>

<p>I wonder if this babbling embodiment of balloon-juice can be taken at his word, and be persuaded to put aside his personal "politics of selfishness" that he visualizes will put him atop the collapsing throne of autocratic power in the District of Collectivism?  To paraphrase Lysander Spooner, perhaps Mr. McCain might see the "national service" he could perform by ending his campaign, and returning to Arizona, there to content himself with the exercise of only so much power as nature has given to him in common with the rest of mankind. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bush&apos;s Pandering</title>
      <link>http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/021024.html</link>
<author>Lew Rockwell</author>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I hate the whole "politics stops at the water's edge" nonsense, which is code for "no dissent from the establishment allowed." Did Bush, when he played the Hitler card in Israel, undermine this nonsense, as well as preview the Republican dirty tricks this fall? By the way, why is it "appeasement" to talk to Iran or Palestine, but not to the USSR or Mao's China or North Korea or Myranmar?</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>re: Obama/Hillary</title>
      <link>http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/021023.html</link>
<author>Nick Bradley</author>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I really don't think it's going to be that close. For one, the polling data does not reflect the severely-depressed GOP turnout that we'll see in the fall, the anti-GOP sentiment, the energized democratic base, or the massive black voter turnout we'll see if Obama is the nominee. The Obama camp has said that their strategy is to capitalize on the resurgence of the party in the Mountain West to capture the presidency. If the '04 <a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/ecc/calculator.htm">map</a> stays the same, Obama wins if he turns CO, NM, and NV -- all close in '04 and all of them are far more blue in 2008. If Obama "goes west", he will focus his message to woo mountain state libertarians, probably more numerous in the belt that runs from Montana to the Mexican border than anywhere else in the country. He will probably pledge to protect gun ownership rights, offer a payroll tax cut with part of the money saved from ending the war, promise wind and solar energy tax credits (solar for AZ, CO, and NM, wind for CO, WY, and MT), and reluctantly support oil shale production as long as the energy companies (1) find their own water source and (2) are fully liable for any environmental damage; McCain's immigration policies will also severely depress the turnout of usually-reliable GOP voters in the region as well. Outside of the Mountain West, there's no way the GOP will win another squeaker in Iowa, nor will they edge out the Dems in Missouri, which has been blue-ing as well. Throw in a possible win in Virginia or even a Deep South state (especially in Georgia if Barr is running), and you have a democratic landslide. On top of that, the temporary lull in violence that the surge facilitated is collapsing rapidly, and McCain is wedded to that policy more than any other American politician, including Bush.<br />
 <br />
What you reap is what you sow, and 7 years of <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/rockwell/red-state-triumph.html">Red State Fascism </a>will come back to bite them in November; It could get ugly...<br />
</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Latest Nonsense from the Lincoln Cult</title>
      <link>http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/021022.html</link>
<author>Thomas DiLorenzo</author>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Compare the words of Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence:</p>

<p>"Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers <br />
from the consent of the governed."</p>

<p>To this, from one Austin Bramwell in the <a href="http://www.takimag.com/blogs/ABramwell/">Takimag blog:</a></p>

<p>"Nothing short of a new national mythology could have justified<br />
the Civil War's carnage.  Lincoln preserved legitimate government<br />
in North America . . . .  For this reason conservatives . . . might<br />
revere Lincoln."</p>

<p>So despite the Lincoln Cult's worshipping of the Declaration (well, actually, only the "all men are created equal" part), we are informed that governments don't derive their just powers from the consent of the governed after all.  One man, in this case Dishonest Abe, is able to invent a new and ahistorical theory about America (his "nationalist mythology"), and prove himself "right" by orchestrating the mass murder of some 350,000 dissenters to the new theory.  <strong>This </strong>is what preserves "legitimate government." </p>

<p>This of course is not new.  It's the tired, old lie that Lincoln himself invented and is kept alive by such propagandists for the American empire as Harry Jaffa and his merry band of Claremontistas.  </p>

<p>Stalin must have loved this theory -- that "legitimate government" is derived from the mass murder of those who do not consent to being governed by Stalin. I suppose that's why communist sympathizers such as Lincoln Cultist Eric Foner of columbia University opposed the break-up of the Soviet Union.  In a Feb. 11, 1991 article in <em>The Nation</em> entitled "Lincoln's Lesson" Foner opposed the secession movements in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, and Georgia and urged Gorbachev to deal with them in the same brutal and barbaric manner that Lincoln dealt wiith his own citizens who didn't buy into his new theory of "nationalist man."  Secession, said Foner, would destroy the "laudable goal" of "overreaching loyalty to the Soviet Union."</p>

<p>There are apparently no limits at all to the nonsense that Lincoln Cultists will come up with as they desperately try to invent more and more excuses for Lincoln's mass murdering of 350,000 of his own citizens.  </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Medicine When It Was Private</title>
      <link>http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/021021.html</link>
<author>Lew Rockwell</author>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>And doctors smoked Camels!</p>

<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gCMzjJjuxQI&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gCMzjJjuxQI&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>¡Viva!</title>
      <link>http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/021020.html</link>
<author>Lew Rockwell</author>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Writes Robert Higgs: "Private-property anarchism is more popular than you would think in Latin America! El Diario de Hoy is El Salvador's top daily <a href="http://www.elsalvador.com/mwedh/nota/nota_opinion.asp?idCat=6342&idArt=2380610">newspaper</a>. And in Mexico City, we have <a href="http://www.asuntoscapitales.com/default.asp?id=3&ids=2&idss=12&ida=3326">this</a>."</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Obama/Hillary in a nutshell</title>
      <link>http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/021019.html</link>
<author>James Ostrowski</author>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Note to liberals</strong>: She has more experience; he's slightly to the left, but not much difference on policy really.  A tossup.</p>

<p>She has a better chance against McCain though many are in denial on this including right-wing Hillary haters and left-wing Obama lovers.</p>

<p>The race is a statistical dead heat and anyone who thinks otherwise hasn't studied the numbers carefully.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Terrified Taxachusetts</title>
      <link>http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/021018.html</link>
<author>Lew Rockwell</author>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>See this hilariously biased <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/05/12/activists_push_to_repeal_state_income_tax/?p1=email_to_a_friend">article</a> from the Boston Globe, an establishment mouthpiece, on the referendum, organized by <a href="http://www.google.com/custom?sa=Search&cof=LW%3A500%3BL%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.lewrockwell.com%2Flewroc1a.gif%3BLH%3A93%3BAH%3Acenter%3BAWFID%3A65dad07a461e3427%3B&domains=lewrockwell.com&q=carla+howell&sitesearch=lewrockwell.com">Carla Howell</a> and her libertarian posse, to repeal the rotten Massachusetts state income tax. (Thanks to Steve Vance.)</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Obama&apos;s Latest Sin</title>
      <link>http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/021017.html</link>
<author>Anthony Gregory</author>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>He called a female reporter "sweetie." Oh dear. </p>

<p>Whenever a female waitress calls me "sweetie," the first thought I always have is to complain to the manager, sue for harassment, and try to make a national issue of it. </p>

<p>Sometimes I think Justin is right about the <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=dUT&q=bizarro+world+justin+raimondo+site%3Aantiwar.com&btnG=Search">Bizarro World</a> America has become. 9/11 -- or <em>something </em>-- has indeed ripped a hole in the space-time continuum, and so now petulant preachers, flag pins and endearing, old-fashioned language are the main campaign issue. Not mass murder and crimes against the Constitution. </p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>State Radio on the Ron Paul Revolution</title>
      <link>http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/021016.html</link>
<author>Lew Rockwell</author>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Kit Maira on what really is the <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90438900&sc=emaf">talk of the nation</a>.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ron Paul on NPR</title>
      <link>http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/021014.html</link>
<author>Max Raskin</author>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90438900">Here's Ron Paul being interviewed</a> on the People's Radio.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bush League Golf</title>
      <link>http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/021013.html</link>
<author>Butler Shaffer</author>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Anthony:  Bush isn't much good as a golfer, either.  He's managed to get himself into one nasty sand-trap.</p>]]></description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>