Writes Chad Odhner: "It's snarky and belittling, but it's actually a pretty fair article. All of these huge papers (Time, NYT, etc) are being overly revelatory regarding the 'less desirable' portion of Paul's base, but at least they're accurately portraying how EXTREMELY endearing he is. I think the emphasis on him not being that exciting (and instead implying that it really is the message) is actually a good message for people to hear. Those of us who are more familiar know that he is EXTREMELY exciting, but not in the traditional Barack Kablamo way."
