The Kentucky LP candidate for the US Senate will not back down from his belligerent, anti-Arab warmongering statements, and has instead elaborated on them and also come out against international trade and in favor of old-style unionism. He seems to be against the war in Iraq and the PATRIOT Act, but still considers all Arabs and Muslims to be "the Enemy."
Interestingly, one of the interviewers asks, "Uh, um, why do you support bombing the OPEC countries if they don’t turn over oil to us, and how exactly is that a libertarian position?" Once the media understand and can explain libertarian principles better than LP candidates can, does that mean the LP is counterproductive, or just obsolete and irrelevant?
