How else to interpret this weaselly story that tries to downplay Ron Paul’s rock star reception at Google by quoting second quarter donations as if they were the response to Ron’s successful appearance. Since second quarter donations closed two weeks before Ron’s record-setting Google visit, and we know that one Google employee handed Ron a $2,300 maximum donation check at the Google Talk, what can one conclude but that the Times deliberately figured out how to prop up the Big Dems at Ron’s expense?