Bush
Wimps Out on Confederate Flag Issue
by
Bill Barnwell
Now
that the NAACP and its band of demagogues have succeeded in removing
the Confederate flag from the South Carolina capitol building, they
are now ready to turn their sights on Texas Governor George W. Bush.
You see, while the Confederate flag isn’t flying above the Texas
capitol, there are remnants of it in the Texas court building and
the NAACP simply will not tolerate it. During the Republican primary
debates when Bush was asked whether or not the flag should fly above
the South Carolina dome, he stated that it was a decision to be
made by the people of South Carolina. It would have been nice to
hear Bush say that the battle flag is a symbol of brave resistance
against tyrannical government, and for the NAACP to take a hike.
However, it’s quite understandable that he wanted to avoid every
race baiting tyrant shouting, "Bush is a bigot" right
before election day.
But
now that Bush’s home state of Texas is about to be targeted by the
South-bashing bigots, he isn’t talking about state’s rights, he
is talking about "compromise," the GOP’s favorite word
when discussing issues involving principle and backbone. In a short
segment shown on MSNBC, Bush was asked why he did not want to keep
the Confederate symbols inside the court building. "Because…because…the
symbolism," Bush babbled. Now what exactly is that supposed
to mean? Is Bush saying that he agrees with the Jesse Jackson crowd
that the flag is a nasty symbol of "hatred" and "racism"?
In an AP story from April 20th, Bush repeated his position
on the South Carolina flag that "It's the right of the state
of South Carolina to make the decision on the flag." Does your own
state of Texas, where you preside, as governor not deserves that
same right Governor Bush? We already know how successful "compromise"
is with the thugs in the NAACP. Even after the cowards in the South
Carolina legislature passed a bill to remove the flag from the dome,
the NAACP, still fighting the Civil War, continued its huffing and
puffing. They vowed to continue their boycott because the flag was
going to be moved to a monument on Statehouse grounds.
Days
later a large coalition of black churches publicly stated that they
also rejected the compromise and would continue to recognize and
support the boycott led by the NAACP. If that is not enough, earlier
in the month, South Carolina lawmakers tried to lighten tensions
by passing a bill that instituted a holiday for America’s most beloved
plagiarist, adulterer, and socialist conman, Martin Luther King,
Jr. However, the NAACP wanted no part of it since the bill also
created a Confederate Memorial Day. The NACCP was so unyielding
that a number of black lawmakers publicly stated that the group
was being unreasonable and that they were supporting the measure
anyway. When will the GOP learn that this is a group that can never
be satisfied, no matter how much pandering, groveling, and compromising
they do?
If
Jack Kemp’s nauseating "reaching out" campaign to the
"minority community" didn’t teach the GOP anything; I
don’t know what will. It seems like the GOP is getting a lot of
advice these days from people who have never been particularly friendly
or helpful to the causes of conservatism. The media and other self-proclaimed
"experts" are constantly told that they must pick up the
"Hispanic vote" no matter how many whites it chases off.
Gerald Ford, a guy who was never elected as president or vice president
and then lost to Jimmy Carter, tells us that the GOP must drop its
pro-life plank and Bush must embrace a pro-choice vice president.
The Republicans are also told that they must stop talking about
issues like tax cuts and start talking about new social programs
or they have no chance.
Bush
has taken most of the advice. He has consistently chased the "Hispanic
vote" and cheered mass immigration even though he is still
well behind Al Gore nationally in gaining their support. He has
never ruled out picking a pro-choice running mate, and he has proposed
enough social programs to be compared to a "New Democrat"
by the Washington Post. Through it all, desperate Republicans
have never questioned Bush and he remains well ahead of Al Gore
according to the Rasmussen Research poll.
Before
the Bushies flood my mailbox with denunciations for questioning
the greatness of their man (Bushies get very upset over criticism),
let me clarify that, yes, I understand how much is at stake this
election and I probably won’t have any other choice but to vote
for Bush. But I am under no illusions that a Bush presidency is
going to result in great conservative achievements. Government won’t
get any smaller, taxes won’t be greatly reduced, troops will stay
in Kosovo, the US will continue policing the world with a Cold War
mentality, the abortion mills will stay in business, etc.
Say
what you will about conservative "cranks" like myself,
but even under Ronald Reagan, the supposed Messiah of conservatism,
government continued to grow. Joe Sobran, one of America’s bravest
and most courageous columnists said it this way, "Most conservatives
still believe in the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, but Reagan
runs a close fourth…. Like God, Reagan comprehends every perfection…and
has ascended to the plane of a Platonic form, a pure essence unsullied
by lower matter." Sorry, but as much as conservatives would
like to dream otherwise, there is nothing godly about the man that
gave us Sandra Day O'Connor and who did nothing while the Department
of Education and other government agencies became more and more
bloated.
Bush
should ignore any advice to "compromise" on the Confederate
flag issue. If he caves into the demands to the thugs of the NAACP
and other enemies of the Confederate flag, he will be dishonoring
the dead Southerners who fought against the tyranny of liberalism
and big government, the same very vices Bush supposedly opposes.
June
9, 2000
Bill
Barnwell is a freelance journalist and co-editor in chief of
www.thepotatoe.com
Bill
Barnwell Archives
|