Trouble at the Prosecutorial Hilton and the Two Americas
by
William L. Anderson
by William L. Anderson
DIGG THIS
While the Duke
Non-Rape, Non-Kidnapping, and Non-Sexual Assault Case has resulted
in the ouster of the miscreant Michael B. Nifong from his prosecutorial
office in Durham, North Carolina, on the other side of the country
it seems that the spirit of Nifongism lives on. Furthermore, if
justice truly is going to be served – and this Nifong case has placed
prosecutors on notice – then either a prosecutor or his wife is
going to have to share a cell with the recently-jailed Paris Hilton.
Now, even with
The Nifong Show playing at full tilt in North Carolina, nothing
has captured the public’s attention more than the Paris Hilton affair
in Los Angeles. Yes, please spare me the "she broke the law
and must pay the consequences" nonsense. I suspect that had
her name been Paris Jones, she would have spent almost no time in
jail, and perhaps none at all.
However, since
she was driving with a revoked license, perhaps Ms. Hilton might
want to change her name to Michelle Delgadillo, the wife of the
prosecutor who went after Hilton, Rocky Delgadillo. It seems that
Ms. Delgadillo has a similar
driving record to the errant Paris, and I can say with certainty
that I would not want to be a passenger in an automobile that either
of them are driving – if I value my life.
In a recent
news account, we have learned the following:
City Attorney
Rocky Delgadillo got Paris
Hilton jailed for violating probation for driving with a suspended
license, then condemned her early release. Now, he says he's embarrassed
about the outstanding bench warrant for his wife, Michelle, the
Los Angeles Times reported Wednesday.
Rocky Delgadillo
said he didn't know about it until this week and has urged his
wife to remedy the situation.
"My wife
is embarrassed about this, and I am embarrassed as well," he said.
The couple
also has been chronically late in paying fines for at least five
parking tickets in the last three years, the newspaper reported.
One violation for parking in a red zone in December 2006 was not
paid until the newspaper inquired about the tickets last month,
by which time the $70 infraction had become a $174 fine with penalties.
However, as
they say on late-night TV, "Wait, there’s more!"
On Monday,
Delgadillo apologized for keeping quiet about a 2004 accident
in which his wife crashed his city-issued vehicle while driving
on a suspended license. Delgadillo said he was reimbursing the
city for the $1,222 repair.
The prosecutor
has said Michelle Delgadillo's offenses are not comparable to
those of Hilton, who is serving a 45-day sentence for violating
her probation in an alcohol-related reckless driving case.
In the latest
disclosure, Michelle Delgadillo said she was "very embarrassed"
and was working to resolve the arrest warrant issue as soon as
possible.
"I will do
whatever the court instructs me to do. I apologize for any embarrassment
this has caused my husband and family," she said in a statement
to the newspaper.
One can be
sure that Ms. Delgadillo is not going to have to worry about spending
several weeks in a cell or having to be humiliated in front of a
judge. After all, she is not Paris Hilton, and in this land
of Two Americas, anyone who might have been born with a silver or
even gold spoon by definition is an Enemy of the People.
Thus, even though it is clear that Hilton’s blue Bentley was targeted
by police and that she was treated much more harshly than is the
situation with most people, anything less than having her hanged,
drawn, and quartered for driving without a driver’s license is not
good enough.
Yes, Paris
Hilton no doubt is not someone I would want one of my sons to marry,
nor do I admire people who make porn
videos of themselves having graphic sex. But that is beside
the point here. Paris Hilton does not operate in my universe, nor
is she someone who generally is going to occupy space in my head.
The issue,
however, is not Paris Hilton nor her sex life, nor even her driving
record. The issue is this: Her case proves to me that mob justice
rules in the United States of America. Furthermore, it also demonstrates
to me that prosecutors generally get a free pass when it comes to
breaking the law.
Yes, that is
a bold statement to make after spending a week watching Michael
Nifong making very public trips to the woodshed and being disbarred
and unceremoniously kicked out of his office. However, Nifong is
just one prosecutor, and it took millions of dollars (tax
dollars, I must add) and a Herculean effort on behalf of a number
of people just to deal with his obvious lawbreaking.
Furthermore,
Nifong only has lost his law license and his job. He has not
lost his freedom, despite lying to judges, withholding evidence,
committing perjury, suborning perjury, engaging in obstruction of
justice, and the like. In fact, there currently are no criminal
investigations that are going on, despite the fact that he was an
in-your-face lawbreaker, and someone whose crimes did not involve
peacefully driving a luxury car, but rather attempting to subvert
the system of justice and knowingly send three innocent people to
prison for 30 years.
Compare the
troubles of Paris Hilton to those of Nifong and ask yourself who
is the greater lawbreaker. For that matter, compare Paris Hilton
to Michelle Delgadillo and ask yourself who has been more flagrant
in breaking the law. Yet, Nifong collects a state pension, Delgadillo
makes excuses, and Hilton sits in jail.
Of course,
there was the public outcry when she first was let out of jail after
four days and given house arrest. Never mind that there were good
reasons for doing so. (It seems that Ms. Hilton realized that because
any guard – male or female – could look into her cell through a
window, a guard also could take pictures of her sitting on the toilet
and then sell the pictures to the tabloids for thousands of dollars.
Now, I doubt anyone would want to take pictures of me on the john
– or even Nifong, for that matter – but someone like Hilton is a
different story.)
Thus, it is
time to allude to my title. Yes, there are Two Americas, but not
the two of which the pathetic John Edwards speaks. (He lives in
a $5 million house – while criticizing others who are wealthy, so
that is all we need to know about him.)
No, there truly
are Two Americas, the one of government employees and politicians
who are protected even while engaging in the worst kind of lawbreaking,
and the other being the America in which the rest of us live. Now,
I really could not care less if Paris Hilton is driving her blue
Bentley around Beverly Hills when the government says she cannot
do so.
However, I
do care when prosecutors’ wives are permitted to flaunt the law
and receive a free pass, and when prosecutors themselves can commit
felony after felony and be treated as though they are "protecting"
the people. The state of affairs to which Edwards points is imaginary,
in my opinion.
But
the Two Americas to which I point is very real. The Delgadillo example
is small, but nonetheless telling. I can assure you that Michelle
Delgadillo is not going to have to worry about a male guard leering
at her while she is sitting on a toilet.
June
22, 2007
William
L. Anderson, Ph.D. [send him
mail], teaches economics at Frostburg State University in Maryland,
and is an adjunct scholar of the Ludwig
von Mises Institute. He also is a consultant
with American Economic Services.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
William
Anderson Archives
|