Duke: The Final Curtain Begins to Close
by
William L. Anderson
by William L. Anderson
DIGG THIS
While I expected
North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper to drop the charges against
Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty, and David Evans in the Duke Non-Rape,
Non-Kidnapping, and Non-Sexual Assault Case, I did not expect him
to be forceful in doing it. While some of what he said seemed to
have been taken from my open letters to him, I take no credit, as
I am not going to flatter myself in thinking he read anything from
me, much less paid attention to it.
That being
said, Cooper’s words were some of the strongest I ever have heard
anyone in his position make. As K.C.
Johnson put on his blog, Cooper's statement had a number of
highlights:
- The players
are innocent – not victims of a case with insufficient evidence,
but innocent. This statement should leave no doubt as to whether
a crime occurred.
- Nifong might
be guilty of criminal misconduct.
- Nifong is
a "rogue prosecutor."
- Lots of
people owe the three players an apology, and a rush to judgment
took place.
- The accuser
has serious mental problems (hinted, very strongly, by the AG).
- North Carolina
needs to change its laws to deal with rogue prosecutors in the
future.
I watched the
press conference live, and it was clear to me that Cooper understood
what was at stake, and did what he had to do. Furthermore, I am
glad for the young men and their families that this ordeal is over,
OVER. I now can say that I had contact with some of them, and I
know what these false charges did to the families.
Yet, I also
need to point out something to those who are going to claim that
"the system works." These charges were false, and transparently
so. There is no way they ever should have seen the light of day,
and there is no way that people should have believed them. Yet,
they did. So, why did this train wreck happen?
The charges
came about because of the politics of race and rape. Often, those
two political spheres collide, as they did in the infamous Kobe
Bryant case a few years ago. In this case, however, those who operate
under the two banners joined forces, and it gave Michael B. Nifong
the cover under which he needed to operate.
Certainly,
a year ago no prosecutor was using the word "rogue" with
Nifong. He was "doing his job," as the talking-head prosecutors
on Cable TV and elsewhere were claiming. Who would have thought
a year ago that "Nifonging" would become a verb used by
the courts to describe a railroad job by rogue prosecutors? Yet,
that has happened, and I can be glad, and many families can be glad,
too.
Yet, it took
millions of dollars to unearth this transparent hoax, and that says
what we need to know about the power of the state. Despite all of
the talk about checks and balances, ultimately, it is the state
that determines if the state is engaged in wrongdoing. Furthermore,
lest we forget, the state is a political entity. We do not
have government divorced from politics, no matter what the politicians
claim be doing.
The politics
of rape dominate the law in this country, and that is not a good
thing. Yes, rape is a terrible crime, but a rape must first be committed
before one can say there was a crime. The modern politics of rape
do not require a rape, only an accusation, and once that accusation
is made, it almost is impossible to dislodge. Even today, even with
the AG’s statement and all of the investigation done, there still
are "rape crisis" advocates out there who will insist
that those three young men raped Crystal Gail Mangum. Take the following
quote:
"I hope people
who experience sexual violence in any form feel comfortable calling
for help ... and know that each case is different, and they can
seek help when they've been violated. There's a possibility that
the way the media handles high-profile sexual assault cases, and
the fear that would happen to any survivor who comes forward,
can have a chilling effect and make them reluctant to step forward."
– Margaret Barrett, executive director, Orange County Rape Crisis
Center in Chapel Hill.
This comes
from the NAACP:
Now, as we
have repeatedly said, comes the hard part. How do we proceed toward
the healing places in our communities and our hearts? Long after
the television vans with their saucer antennas have pulled out
of Durham, long after the bloggers have grown weary from typing,
those of us who believe in freedom and justice can not rest. How
do we work to ensure that the final decisions in this case in
no way deter women of color from making claims of violations against
them which violate their spirits and their bodies?" – statement
from William J. Barber II, president of the North Carolina NAACP.
Thus, we see
the intersection of the politics of race and rape. That intersection
more often than not produces lies, and we have seen the wreckage.
This part of
the case is over, although the trials for Michael Nifong are just
beginning. One can hope that this miscreant meets the bar of justice.
There are more people who need to meet that bar, too, and I will
deal with them at a different time.
I
also want to personally thank Lew Rockwell for giving me a forum.
A year ago, it was just a few of us writing, going up against the
justice system of North Carolina, as well as the entire mainstream
media. Lew stood up for what was right, and many people are grateful
to him for his courage, and I am especially grateful.
April
12, 2007
William
L. Anderson, Ph.D. [send him
mail], teaches economics at Frostburg State University in Maryland,
and is an adjunct scholar of the Ludwig
von Mises Institute.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
William
Anderson Archives
|