Recently by Eric Peters: DIY Don't Do's
Napoleon believed in liberty just not for most people.
Most people, he reportedly said, are herd-cattle not capable of living as individuals in society without the external restraint of authority to keep them from abusing one another. Most men, in other words, are only kept at bay kept from committing acts of violence and fraud by the threat of violence in return.
Not by self-restraint; not because they are morally enlightened.
The prod and only the prod.
In his own way, the dapper dictator was a Libertarian. A cynical one, perhaps but also probably accurate in his estimation of the masses of humanity.
Id go further. I doubt most people even desire liberty.
Not really.
Most people, no matter where they fall on the political continuum, are quite happily habituated to the omnipresence of government to omnipresent control in exchange (supposedly) for safety.
How many people out there would be willing to forgo any claim to a government check for anything retirement, health care, unemployment compensation in return for the liberty to provide for themselves, successfully or not? No, wait, lets go deeper. To agree with the statement that no one is entitled to take money from anyone else for any purpose, without their consent?
I doubt the answer is one out of 100. Maybe not even that.
Clear majorities support the emerging police state the universal monitoring, the mass frisks.
Democrats that is, left-leaning statists are of course a lost cause. Theres no point even trying to speak with the we needs and society oughts. Even in the abstract, theyre not for liberty; theyve embraced communal responsibility. We are all in this together even though some of us might prefer to go our own way, make our decisions and just be left alone.
Which of course, we wont be.
It is interesting to note in this connection the odd fact that left-liberal statists are deemed and deem themselves caring (that is, humanistic) people while anyone who objects to their schemes of violent control to their talk of helping some people with other peoples money, taken at the point of a gun is regarded as selfish and mean-spirited.
But it is conservatives Republicans who are the most depressing. Because they claim to love liberty the abstract conception of it, at least. But down in the mud, theyre as or even more statist than the left-liberal Democrats they claim to oppose.
For example: Try and find a Republican who will support the elimination of taxes on real estate so that people can really own their homes and land. Instead he will talk about our childrens future and the importance of having good schools paid for with the liberty of home and land owners who are in fact feudal serfs permitted temporary and conditional use of the countys property so long as the annual property tax is paid. It is as hard to find a Republican who will say that it is the responsibility of parents to provide for the education of their children not the parents neighbors as it is to find a purple Brontosaurus in Central Park. The Republican conception of property rights and thus, of human rights is as crippled from the get-go as the left-liberal Democrat conception of them.
It has been observed correctly that every major point of the Communist Manifesto is now a given an accepted part of our everyday lives from a heavy progressive or graduated income tax to the centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
But its worse than that; weve also got all the major elements of Mussolini-style fascism which really ought to be called corporatism firmly in place, too. The racial-nationalism stuff most people associate with the term (fascism) is a bogey. The part that matters and the part we have is the marriage of state with corporate power; the creation of de facto (and even de jure) industrial combines that use government power to suck vast riches into the clutches of (for example) the defense industry, big finance and so on with the government enjoying vast regulatory power (in practice, control and micromanagement of individuals) as its payoff in return.
Most Republicans and conservatives are at best limited statists. They want government, too. Just directed in the way they think proper. Which means they are just as eager to put a gun to your head or otherwise threaten you with violence to provide funds for x or obey y. Which makes them fundamentally no different than the Democrats.
Which is why we find government Cloverism everywhere.
There is no escape, either. No way out.
Not until it becomes possible to escape this Earth and try again on some other Earth, as far away from this one as relativistic physics can take us.
But even then, I am not optimistic. The dormant seeds of Cloverism will probably accompany the intrepid travelers, ready to sprout to life once more in fresh, momentarily virgin soil. Just as happened here in North America. Liberty not perfect, but not too far from it survived on this continent only very briefly before Cloverism came alive once more, re-establishing itself with even greater vigor.
This is the real tragedy of the human condition; not just the lust to control but the desire the need to be controlled.
Napoleon understood this and he acted accordingly.