Recently by Simon Black: Become a Multi-Millionaire… asaTaxSnitch
When I woke up this morning and scanned through my usual digest – boots on the ground reports from overseas contacts, market summaries from Asian and European bankers, commentary from friends still in the intelligence community – a couple of things caught my eye that I want to tell you about.
Dagong Global Credit Rating Co is China’s leading credit rating agency. Credit rating agencies are the firms who are responsible, among other things, for scoring the credit risk of a particular asset or sovereign nation.
When they rate a security as “AAA.” premium safety, investors pile in. They’re an integral part of the financial system.
You undoubtedly remember that the world’s leading agencies – Fitch, Moody’s, and S&P, were all complicit in slapping AAA premium ratings on so many toxic mortgage-backed securities… and maintaining sound ratings for far too long on bankrupt nations like Greece and Portugal.
The entire industry lacks credibility at this point, and China’s Dagong agency aims to do something about that.
This morning I read Dagong president Guan Jianzhong’s remarks at a recent conference of Asian rating agency CEOs held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (one of my favorite cities).
In his speech, Guan called for the establishment of a global rating agency that follows clearly outlined international standards, effectively putting an end to the cowardly analysis that dominates the industry now and replacing it with a healthy dose of reality.
Putting its money where its mouth is, Dagong has a long-standing, negative outlook on US debt that doesn’t pull any punches. From its November 2010 report:
“In essence the depreciation of the U.S. dollar adopted by the U.S. government indicates that its solvency is on the brink of collapse, therefore it wants to cut its debt through the act of devaluation with the national will; such a move has severely harmed the interests of creditors.”
Following suit, S&P stunned financial markets this morning by revising its US outlook to “negative,” citing politicians’ inability to address medium-term and long-term challenges.