On the Scent of a Fishy Economy

Recently by Peter Schiff: The New Ideological Divide

Throughout history, governments have gotten themselves into trouble by spending more than they have, observes Peter D. Schiff in How an Economy Grows and Why it Crashes. When the gap caused by overspending becomes too big, difficult choices arise, he adds.

“One option is for the government to increase revenue by raising taxes. This path is never popular with citizens, and in a democracy is hard to push through. Even in authoritarian states (where there are no pesky elections), tax increases are problematic.”

Higher tax rates always discourage productivity and deflate economic vitality, the author explains. There is a limit to how high taxes can go, he notes. “Raise them enough, and people stop working. Raise them higher, and they may even start rioting.”

Is there a better option? Yes, the government can cut spending. But this option is more difficult than raising taxes, because those whose benefits are cut are particularly apt to express their hostility both at the polls and on the street, Schiff cautions. This is especially true, he says, when the recipients feel entitled to the benefits. “Politicians make lots of promises to secure their elections and voters rarely consider the ability of taxpayers to actually foot the bills.”

How an Economy Grows a... Schiff, Andrew J. Best Price: $1.99 Buy New $7.20 (as of 11:05 UTC - Details)

Default or inflate

One other alternative before the government is to default, by telling the creditors that it cannot pay the full amount of its debt obligations; but this is an embarrassing option because it amounts to an official acknowledgement of insolvency, the author outlines.

If this sounds eerie, a disguise is available: Printing money to pay the debts, effectively repudiating the obligations by inflating them away. Since inflation is usually the easiest choice to make, it is often the most likely, he rues. “But while it may seem easy at first, it ultimately exacts the harshest toll.”

Inflation, as Schiff instructs, is simply a means to transfer wealth from anyone who has savings in a particular currency to anyone who has debt in the same currency. With hyperinflation, the value of savings gets completely wiped out and the burden of debt is removed, he continues. “Those who own hard assets do okay, because, unlike savings in currency, assets will rise in nominal value when inflation flares up.”

Crash Proof 2.0: How t... Peter D. Schiff Best Price: $1.50 Buy New $3.97 (as of 10:46 UTC - Details)

Illusion of improvement

A ‘reality check’ box in the book reminds one that an economy can’t grow because people spend; people spend because an economy grows. However, an ‘illusion of improvement’ can be created by the newly printed notes!

On the claim of some economists that the recession period in the US is over, the author is sceptical. Any recovery has been stopped by stimulus programmes, and so the work of rebalancing the economy remains unfinished, he feels. “The creation of ever greater quantities of debt has given us a reprieve from the process of returning to living standards commensurate with our productivity. But at some point in the foreseeable future, perhaps in the next few years, we will have a very ugly encounter with our debt.”

With more than half of US government debt currently sold to foreign governments, what will happen when the buyers change their mind? With very little domestic savings to tap into, Americans alone won’t be able to pick up the slack, avers Schiff. When that day comes, the two options before the US will be to default or to cause inflation. Both options, he foresees, will violently force American living standards downward through lost purchasing power and higher interest rates.

Allegory of island communities

The dismal tale of economy on a tailspin comes alive through catchy illustrations by Brendan Leach set in island communities, Sinopia and Usonia. Sample this: “Despite the bailouts and incentives made by Bass and Plankton, the Usonian economy continued to deteriorate during the Great Hut Rut. Strangely, no one showed much interest in buying new huts. Instead of spending their stimulus fish, some islanders elected to save them. With spending stagnant, the cart companies teetered on the edge of extinction. Hut Depot was devastated. Unemployment got worse. Public dissatisfaction intensified…”

Read the rest of the article