'The 'Tax Mahal': A Shrine to Corporate Socialism

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare

According to architect Jonathan Levi, the renovation of the IRS regional headquarters in Andover, Massachusetts is a “visionary” project that “will be relevant 50 years from now.”

This is true in exactly the same sense that the Soviet-era monuments that still disfigure the Russian countryside remain relevant reminders of that omnivorous state.

Our descendants would be exceptionally fortunate if the Andover IRS “service center” were among the institutional tombstones marking the demise of history’s most profligate kleptocracy.

Recent headlines bring fresh evidence that the Regime may implode far sooner than many expect. The Federal Government’s debt will exceed the gross domestic product no later than 2012, a development that will most likely initiate a “debt super cycle” in which we will experience both hyperinflation and extortionate interest rates.

Like their antecedents in the Gorbachev-era Communist Party of the Soviet Union, the American nomenklatura is preparing for the impending implosion by siphoning away whatever wealth they can find. This is why maintaining and enhancing the State’s instruments of coercion and wealth extraction is the Regime’s most urgent priority.

The $92 million “stimulus"-funded expansion and renovation of the Andover IRS “service center” is a tangible illustration of that fact. But as with so many other things, the really interesting thing here is the backstory.

Until two years ago, the IRS planned to shut down the Andover outpost no later than 2009. At the time, the facility — which processed paper tax returns — was already obsolete, since a majority of tax victims now fill out and file those documents on-line. Shuttering the Andover office would have left roughly 1,400 tax-subsidized chair-moisteners without employment.

It’s quite common for private businesses to undergo workforce reductions as a result of changing technology and market demands. For example, just last week Hewlett-Packard announced that it would be shedding 9,000 jobs as a result of what it described as “consolidation” and “streamlining” of its operations.

Despite the best efforts by the IRS to mimic the behavior of productive people — calling those it plunders “customers,” for instance, a term that applies to tax victims in the same way the word “lover” could be used to describe a victim of prison rape, and for exactly the same reason — the IRS is, unalterably, a government entity.

Since it doesn’t conduct “business,” it cannot go out of business, and its employees receive special solicitude from the political class.

In April 2008, six New England Congressbeings, led by Massachusetts Rep. Niki Tsongas, began to pressure IRS commissar Douglas Shulman and the Treasury Department to find some way to keep the 1,400 surplus cubicle-dwellers on the public payroll. The pressure campaign grew increasingly shrill and insistent as the June 30, 2009 deadline for closing down the Andover office drew closer.

Beginning in early 2009, many of the Andover functionaries were given sinecures distributing “stimulus” checks to other appendages of the Leviathan. But this simply wasn’t enough to keep the trough filled. Displaying a certain depraved creativity, Rep. Tsongas and her comrades suggested that IRS employees be given another make-“work” position courtesy of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), the corporate socialist centerpiece of the October Revolution of 2008.

Tsongas and her crew fired off a letter to TARP Special Inspector General Neil M. Barofsky urging him to guarantee a “preference” for Andover IRS employees in handing out pork-barrel positions. This is because, as every dutiful collectivist will tell you, prosperity is a product of government control over the economy.

“The creation and preservation of jobs within the federal government are paramount toward rebuilding and strengthening America’s economy,” insisted Tsongas and her colleagues. “Keeping America’s workforce working is key to rebuilding our broken economy.” (Emphasis added.)

Note well that “America’s workforce” as described in that letter consists entirely of people in the tax-consuming class, rather than the wealth-producing sector. Note also that keeping the parasites firmly attached to the dying host is of “paramount” concern.

All of these efforts to save IRS jobs in Andover are delaying actions intended to keep the payroll swollen with tax-engorged apparatchiks until the Tax Mahal is complete.

The IRS was permitted to keep $92 million in confiscated wealth — an amount designated as “stimulus” funds — to expand and “modernize” its Andover “campus.” Supposedly justified in the name of reducing the regional office’s “carbon footprint,” the funding is actually being used to pimp out the facility in Cadillac fashion.

Among the new appointments and appurtenances, reports the Boston Herald, will be a reflecting pool, an art gallery, indoor gardens, a 7,000-square-foot cafeteria and an amphitheater. The objective, explains architect Jonathan Levi, is to turn the IRS facility into "a comfortable, collaborative environment. It will be welcoming for the people who use it."

The “comforts,” of course, are for the benefits of the government-employed predators who will staff the office. The extravagant appointments and ornamental touches will provide no comfort to visitors who find themselves on the receiving end of the IRS’s malign attentions.

This is how the Regime ruling us defines economic “recovery”:

Two years ago, that building was scheduled to be shut down, with a corresponding reduction in the wealth-devouring population. Now it’s being expensively renovated, and plans are being finalized to expand the ranks of tax-gatherers and paper-polluters stationed therein.

On April 1 — the symbolic birthday of anyone who still believes that government is in any sense compatible with civilized living — Tsongas and 14 other Congressional figures (the word “representatives” simply doesn’t work) from Massachusetts and New Hampshire sent another letter to IRS commissar Shulman urging him to exploit “this state-of-the-art resource by expanding the number of employees at the facility.” Not surprisingly, one specific personnel recommendation was to expand the number of auditors stationed in Andover.

Boston Herald columnist Howie Carr, who enjoys goading gangsters in both the private and public sectors, points out that “last year, 626 streetlights were turned off” in Andover “because the town couldn’t afford them anymore.”

“Billions are sucked out of what remains of the economy’s productive sector to pay ever-more-outrageous salaries and benefits to politically correct layabouts who spend all day e-mailing one [another] and sharpening pencils, assuming they show up at all,” observed Carr. “Meanwhile, on Main Street, every week you drive by more empty storefronts, not to mention shuttered factories or car dealerships, and further out of town, dying or abandoned malls.”

While contemplating the exertions undertaken by the political class infesting New England to save 1,400 IRS jobs, I was irresistibly reminded of Bill Clinton’s April 1993 “Timber Summit” in Portland, Oregon.

The advertised purpose of that event was to draw together “stakeholders” in the Pacific Northwest to devise a federal management plan that would expand endangered species protection for the spotted owl, while inflicting no “net job loss” for the region.

The substantive purpose of that event, of course, was to offer patently insincere gestures of comfort to the hundreds of thousands of families in the Northwest whose livelihoods were about to be destroyed by a land lockup program that was already a "done deal."

Screwing his face into what would become a nauseatingly familiar simulacrum of sympathy, Clinton told the audience at the Timber Summit that although he would try to save their jobs, “I can’t repeal the laws of change.” Those purported “laws” dictated that millions of acres be locked up by Washington, leaving entire towns destitute and reducing their residents to dependency on federal welfare.

This wasn’t the ineluctable outcome of impersonal historical forces, or a product of market demand; it was a result of deliberate choices imposed on millions of productive Americans by the Regime that presumes to rule them.

On the other hand, the trends that would have resulted in the closure of the IRS’s Andover office reflected natural, organic change, at least in terms of the relevant technology. Yet the same government that ravaged the Northwest’s timber industry has spared no expense or effort to preserve the paychecks of 1,400 tax-consumers on the IRS’s payroll.

Immunizing the wealth-devouring population from the “laws of change” is just one element of the Regime’s full-spectrum lawlessness. It is devoutly to be hoped that our descendants will be both wiser and freer than we have been, and will transmit to their heirs the dismal lessons they have learned while sifting through the rubble of the state presently afflicting us.

William Norman Grigg [send him mail] publishes the Pro Libertate blog and hosts the Pro Libertate radio program.

The Best of William Norman Grigg

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare