You should treat people with respect instead of having a bunch of bin inspectors, bin police. Eric Pickles, the communities secretary in Britains new Lib-Con coalition government, has announced that the government will not be pressing ahead with a bin tax or pay-as-you-throw schemes designed to charge householders based on the amount of non-recycled waste they dispose of.
Yet Pickles is proposing a new approach that is simply a bit more carrot than stick. (On the same day, however, Bristol city council announced plans to introduce smaller bins and fine residents up to £1,000 if they dont separate their waste correctly. Plus ça change ) The incentive schemes Pickles is offering in place of a bin tax, which would reward people for recycling rather than punish them for not recycling, still assume that the tedious business of separating our waste for recycling is the best way of dealing with rubbish. Which it isnt.
Suncast Recycle Bin Ki... Buy New $52.18 (as of 11:36 UTC - Details)
The power to trial pay-as-you-throw schemes was legislated for in the UK Climate Change Act of 2009. Five local authorities were allowed the opportunity to test out the scheme. However, none of them actually tried it. Pickles new alternative is based on a different scheme piloted in Windsor and Maidenhead, a local authority west of London. An American company, RecycleBank, is working with the council to offer householders rewards for recycling. Residents sign up for a RecycleBank account and then receive points for how much material they put in their recycling bins. They can then exchange those points for discounts at local shops or give their points, as cash, to charity.
Green Hell: How Enviro... Best Price: $1.25 Buy New $8.10 (as of 05:10 UTC - Details)
Getting rewarded for doing the right thing seems like a pretty good idea. It does not put the costs up, Pickles told BBC News. Actually, what it does is it increases the recycling rate and puts money into the local economy. But this money is not being magicked up out of thin air. Rather it represents the saving made by councils by not having to pay the punitive costs for sending rubbish to landfill because instead they are encouraging local residents to sort the rubbish out. As RecycleBank boss Matthew Tucker told spiked last year: For every tonne that we help a council divert from landfill, we take a percentage of that saving. If the council doesnt save, we dont make any money. (For a fuller discussion of the pros and cons of recycling, see Recycling: an eco-ritual we should bin, by Rob Lyons).
The saving comes from the severe regime put in place to encourage councils (with a financial gun to their heads) to stop using landfill to dispose of waste. There are two elements to this. Firstly, there is the landfill tax. This is charged on every single tonne of active waste (in other words, anything that might decompose, including wood and plastic as well as food) that goes to landfill. The current rate is £48 per tonne. On top of this, councils are also set targets for a maximum total amount of waste going to landfill. If they breach those levels, a fine of £150 per tonne is imposed.
There are numerous other ways to dispose of waste other than landfill and recycling. For example, many more councils in the UK now use incinerators (or, to use the proper parlance, energy-from-waste facilities) to burn waste and generate electricity. If a combined heat and power scheme is tacked on, then the waste heat can also be used to heat local offices, factories and homes. So some councils have quickly built energy-from-waste facilities to get round these fines and taxes.
June 14, 2010