by Jeff Clark: Competition
for the IMF's Gold?
Jerry’s broker wrinkled his nose in disapproval.
“I don’t like it, Jerry,” he said in a grave tone,
as if scolding a misbehaving child. “Why don’t you invest
in the gold company I told you about?”
Jerry thought this might happen. His broker was traditional, conventional,
and only pushed company products. And the man knew embarrassingly
little about gold stocks.
“Because I want to diversify my gold stocks. There’s
a lot of gold around the world. And this company is capitalizing
The broker was shaking his head. “The company I recommend
is right here in North America, Jerry. There’s no need to buy
one with mines halfway around the world. Besides, we don’t
know what the politics are over there.”
Disappointed with the mainstream advice, Jerry left and called
another broker. This one specialized in resource stocks.
Jerry explained his reasoning for wanting to buy this particular
gold stock. The broker listened patiently, but was so quiet Jerry
thought maybe he was cool on the idea.
“Politics in general are somewhat unpredictable there, but
less so for mining,” the broker explained. “In fact, they
just lowered their tax rate on mining companies. The company he’s
recommending is well run, but it’s already a mature producer
with a huge market cap, and has no exposure to these other parts
of the world you’re looking at.”
Jerry felt comfortable with his original hunch after finishing
his discussion with the new broker. He put some of his money into
the stock of the younger gold producer, with assets on the other
side of the globe.
A year later, Jerry ran into his old broker at a local bar. The
man smirked when he spotted Jerry. He was obviously unhappy about
losing Jerry’s account and apparently wanted to rub it in.
“You should’ve bought that gold stock I recommended
last year,” the broker said smugly. “It’s up 43%.”
“Good for you,” Jerry replied, “But that stock
I told you about is up 75%.”
The broker’s smile wilted, and confusion clouded his expression.
He spoke tentatively, not sure he wanted to hear the answer. “How’d
you know to look at companies there?”
“Lots of reasons,” Jerry replied. “But for starters,
there’s lots of gold over there.”
Gold Around the Globe
The keyword is geographical diversification. And while no single
investment variable can guarantee profits, geographical diversification
does add a layer of safety and enhanced profit potential that investing
solely in companies located in one country or region cannot offer.
Jerry’s broker, like many in the U.S. who don’t know much
about the gold industry, is uncomfortable investing in smaller producers
or in faraway regions. And yet, most of the gold is currently being
dug up in Africa, South America, China, and Oceania. North America
accounts for only 16.3% of total gold production.
Further, of the 15 largest gold deposits in the world, only five
are in the U.S., Canada, or Mexico. Many countries where gold has
been traditionally mined, such as South Africa and the U.S., are
experiencing production declines, while other areas, like South
America and China, are just now starting to rev up.
First Step to Geographical Diversification: Make sure you have
global exposure. If you’re only investing in companies
that have deposits where you have cell phone coverage, you’re
greatly limiting your profit potential. Don’t ignore a region
just because it’s an unfamiliar culture or doesn’t speak
“Can We Tax That?”
Don’t get me started on politicians and NGO’s [Non-Governmental
Organizations] monkey-wrenching the free market’s wheels. Hey,
I want mining companies to keep cyanide out of the drinking water
and for local communities to see some economic benefits as much
as the next guy. In point of fact, most modern mining efforts run
clean operations and provide good-paying jobs to local residents.
But more often than not, greed is the motivation behind the politics
– governments want revenue, and mining companies can be an
As gold and silver mining-stock investors, it is imperative we
understand and monitor the politics of any region where our companies
operate. And not just the federal or provincial authorities; we
must be alert to local community sentiment towards mining as well.
Just because federal or state regulations are supportive doesn’t
prevent a local group from agitating against a development.
And laws affecting miners can change at any time, and suddenly,
making the political climate tricky to judge and planning for mining
companies and investors difficult. Would it be safe for me to assume,
for example, that your tax planning of 10 years ago has had to be
modified? The same applies with mining.
A stable political jurisdiction today can be tomorrow’s iffy
hotbed of discontent. For example, the U.S. is consistently rated
one of the lowest-risk countries in Resource Stocks’ yearly
World Risk Survey. Yet, Washington politicians have drafted a bill
that, if passed, would adversely affect mining in the U.S. While
nothing is imminent, and we don’t expect it would pass in its
current form, we can’t say that mining in the U.S. will never
have any risk, and it is something we have to keep an eye on at
On the other hand, eight of the world’s 10 highest-risk jurisdictions
are in Africa, where Randgold has all of its operations. However,
they mostly operate in countries where the politics are more stable,
reducing their political risk to a tolerable and more predictable
The lesson: we cannot make assumptions about politics and mining
based on geography.
So what’s the solution?
Second Step to Geographical Diversification: Don’t be
overexposed to any single government. In today’s political
climate, and for the foreseeable future, there is no such thing
as a 100% risk-free country. Politicians and political whims come
and go, so risk will always be fluid. And we think gold mining could
become an increasingly attractive target as the gold price rises
and international economies struggle.
Of course, there are areas we’d simply avoid. Of the 15 largest
gold deposits mentioned above, we wouldn’t consider investing
in six of them solely because of the host country’s politics.
We want diversification but not at the expense of unnecessary risk.
The One-Company Rule
Okay, perfect politics is a fairytale, so is there a way to minimize
a downdraft in your portfolio if a government makes a negative move
against one of your company’s mines, or mining in general?
Third Step to Geographical Diversification: Own a sufficient
number of companies. Having several eggs in many baskets will
prevent your portfolio from suffering a Humpty Dumpty event if the
government where your mining stocks are concentrated decides to
follow, for example, Venezuela’s lead. Country risk can be
offset with the right mix of stocks. That’s why we don’t
just buy Barrick and say, “We’re diversified!”
So… is your gold stock portfolio globalized? Do you have too
much exposure to any one government? And do you own enough gold
stocks so that bad news with any one company doesn’t sink your
The easiest way to diversify, of course, is to buy a mutual fund
(see the table below for our top picks). But we think the mining
stocks with the greatest profit potential are those newer producers
with operations in regions seeing increasing production and greater
“Buy low, sell high” is easier said than done. Is
there a particularly good time to buy gold? Are there patterns in
gold’s market fluctuations? Find out everything you need to
know in our FREE Special Report How Do I Know When to Buy? Click
here to read it right now.
Clark is editor of Casey's
Gold & Resource Report in Casey’s Daily Dispatch.