Nullification, Secession, and the Human Scale of Political Order

Email Print



For three days
last week, on the third floor of the Francis Marion Hotel in downtown
Charleston, SC, a group of scholars have been meeting to discuss
the history of nullification and secession in American law and politics,
and the continued relevance of those concepts today.

I had the privilege
of joining them for the weekend-long event, hosted by the Abbeville
, entitled Nullification, Secession, and the Human
Scale of Political Order, and it has been an amazing learning experience.

scholars such as Abbeville founder Donald Livingston, Thomas DiLorenzo,
Thomas Naylor, Marshall DeRosa, Kirkpatrick Sale, Yuri Maltsev,
and Kent Masterson Brown all addressed the gathering of well over
100 attendees during the course of the weekend.

We learned
that, in politics at least, size does matter, and smaller is better.
Fifty percent of countries have populations of less than 5.5 million
people, including nine of the top ten in terms of wealth per capita,
and nine of the fourteen freest states on the planet.

Which would
come as no surprise to political philosophers throughout history,
from Aristotle to David Hume, who have long argued that, like a
metastasizing cancer cell, there is a point at which (republican
pretensions notwithstanding) a centralized nation’s growth
can render it dangerous and ungovernable.

The Soviet
Union learned this fact in the latter half of the Twentieth Century,
as Yuri Maltsev, a former adviser to Boris Yeltsin and senior scholar
at the Ludwig von Mises Institute,
reminded the group. Though the Soviet leaders had no interest in
republican pretensions, to stay in power, they were forced to control
the lives of hundreds of millions of people spread across eleven
time zones and one sixth of the Earth’s surface. Unfortunately,
Yuri noted, the only way to do this was through mass murder, and
even that eventually failed when the regime literally ran out of

the rest of the article

9, 2010

Email Print