Climate Change Treaty a Precursor to Global Government?

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare

Writing
for World Net Daily, Dr. Jerome Corsi states
, "A former
science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher says
the real purpose of the United Nations Climate Change Conference
in Copenhagen on Dec. 7–18 is to use global warming hype as
a pretext to lay the foundation for a one-world government."

Corsi quotes
Lord Christopher Monckton as telling a Minnesota Free Market Institute
audience at Bethel University in St. Paul, "Your president
will sign it. Most of the Third World countries will sign it, because
they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing
regimes from the European Union will rubberstamp it. Virtually nobody
won’t sign it."

Corsi quotes
Monckton as also saying, "I read that treaty and what it says
is this: that a world government is going to be created. The word
‘government’ actually appears as the first of three purposes of
the new entity."

See
a YouTube video segment
of Lord Monckton’s address. Plus, here
is a later Fox Business interview with Lord Monckton
, in which
he further expands his thoughts.

Did Lord Monckton
exaggerate?

My research
of the Climate Change document that Monckton references found the
following: it is a 181-page working document that does not mention
the words "ballot," "elected official," or "vote"
anywhere in it. In my opinion, Lord Monckton did not exaggerate;
if anything, he may have understated the situation. The document
does indeed appear to be the institutional framework for an unelected
supreme communist-style world government.

By signing
this document, the United States (and other industrial nations)
will forever take responsibility for the ills of backwards and third-world
countries. And, according to Lord Monckton, this would include China
and India, along with the countries of Africa. Notice:

Page 6, "PP.15
Further acknowledging that developed countries have a historical
responsibility for their disproportionate contribution to the causes
and consequences of climate change, reflecting their disproportionate
historical use of a shared global carbon space since 1850 as well
as their proposed continuing disproportional use of the remaining
global carbon space . . . Warming of the climate system, as a consequence
of human activity, is unequivocal."

Page 38, "28.
The adverse effects of climate change and response measures, due
to the historical cumulative GHG emissions of developed countries,
constitute an additional burden on all developing country Parties
(particularly low-lying and other small island countries, countries
with low-lying coastal, arid and semi-arid areas or areas liable
to floods, drought and desertification, and developing countries
with fragile mountainous ecosystems) in reducing poverty, developing
strategies to address social vulnerabilities and attaining sustainable
development and a threat to achieving the United Nations Millennium
Development Goals."

Page 122, "17.
(a) Compensate for damage to the LDC’s economy and also compensate
for lost opportunities, resources, lives, land and dignity . . ."

"(b) Africa,
in the context of environmental justice, should be equitably compensated
for environmental, social and economic losses . . ."

By signing
and being party to this document, we are accepting legal financial
responsibility to support non-developed countries FOREVER.

Page 27, "(b)
Particularly vulnerable populations, groups and communities, [or]
All vulnerable groups whose adaptive capacity is low, [or] Groups
requiring special protection . . ."

Page 43, "41.
(a) Assessed contributions of at least 0.7% of annual GDP of developed
country Parties." These funds will go directly to governments
and "community organizations."

Page 39, "33.
[The financial burden] must be at least USD 67 billion (in the range
of USD 70–140 billion) per year."

The commitments
of the developed countries are "economy wide." Page 58,
"7. (a) Mitigation commitments by all developed countries are
legally binding economy wide and absolute quantified emission reduction
commitments."

"(b) Mitigation
actions by developing countries are VOLUNTARY . . ." (Emphasis
added.)

The system
appears to be loaded to ensure that the world body overseeing this
document is granted total control for the enforcement of the requirements
of this document throughout all developed countries. Penalties for
non-compliance by developed countries are scattered throughout the
document.

It appears
that what a U.S. President and Congress (Republican or Democratic)
could not do through the constitutional legislative process, they
are attempting to do through international treaty. Therefore, it
is my studied opinion that Lord Monckton’s assessment that this
upcoming Climate Change Convention in Copenhagen is a "pretext"
for the establishment of one world government is "spot-on."

It does seem
to be getting clearer and clearer that if the elected civil magistrates
in Washington, D.C., do not quickly grow some backbone and develop
some sagacity as to the direction these globalists are taking our
country, resistance will be forced (in one way or another) upon
the States and the People, because it is not possible for the policies
and financial burden that are – and will be – levied upon the backs
of the American people to be sustained without the surrender of
independence, the abridgment of constitutional government, and the
loss of liberty. Stay tuned.

November
2, 2009

Chuck Baldwin [send
him mail
] is a talkshow host and pastor. Here
is his website.

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare
  • LRC Blog

  • LRC Podcasts