Russians Don’t Belong to the Church of Obama

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare

Icy Smiles for Obama in Moscow

by Eric Margolis by Eric Margolis Recently by Eric Margolis: Doc Offers Cure for GOP

President Barack Obama’s visit to Moscow last week raised some very important questions about US-Russian relations and national security.

Given the media’s constant threat-mongering, it’s easy to forget that America’s most important national security concern is not Iran, Iraq, al-Qaida, Taliban, Afghanistan, or North Korea, whose unloved "Dear Leader" appears terminally ill.

It is Russia, which has over 2,000 nuclear warheads on some 800 delivery vehicles pointed at the United States.

Russia holds a nuclear gun to America’s head, as America does to Russia. The two great powers cannot and must not risk crises when nuclear annihilation is only a button-push away.

Clearly, Washington’s first priority is maintaining correct, civilized relations with Moscow. That means avoiding confrontation, and treating Russia with a large amount of respect even if we do not like its increasingly autocratic government and gruesome human rights record in Chechnya.

The Bush administration put the US and Russia on a collision course by expanding American strategic influence into the Baltic, East Europe, Georgia and Ukraine. This violated a reported secret agreement between former party chairman Mikhail Gorbachev and the first President George Bush which stipulated that in exchange for Moscow allowing its former satellites to go free, western power would not be extended up to Russia’s borders.

Bush’s plans for an antimissile system in the Czech Republic and Poland (only 190 km from Russia’s border) to supposedly shoot down Iranian nuclear-armed missiles that don’t exist was an act of monumental stupidity and pointless belligerence. Moscow was predictably enraged.

Last year, the Bush administration encouraged Georgia’s not so bright leader to invade the pro-Russian breakaway region of South Ossetia, sparking a short, nasty Russo-Georgian conflict that brought Washington and Moscow into dangerous confrontation. US warships moved into the Black Sea and US military aircraft began ferrying supplies to Georgia.

Imagine America’s reaction if Russia began rearming Cuba and sending warships to cruise off Miami.

President Barack Obama says he went to Moscow last week to push what he called the "restart" button on battered US-Russian relations. A good decision, and badly needed. The two great powers need just the kind of mutually respectful relations that Obama has been advocating.

Moscow and Washington signed another nuclear arms reduction treaty making modest cuts in their nuclear arsenals over ten years to 1,500—1,675 warheads each — still enough to destroy civilization three times over. Interestingly, the US’s large reserve of nuclear warheads were not included.

The "reduction" was a major disappointment. Neither side needs more than a few hundred nuclear warheads. In fact, the "antiwar" Obama should have begun seriously negotiating scrapping all nuclear weapons rather than modest reductions. Every American president since Dwight Eisenhower called for global nuclear disarmament, mostly recently Barack Obama — but to no avail. Resistance from America’s national security complex, and the difficulty of convincing other nations to disarm thwarted their idealistic plans.

The US and Russia are also violating the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty which called on all nuclear powers to totally eliminate their nuclear weapons.

Obama came away from Moscow with the Kremlin’s curious agreement to allow the US to fly soldiers and supplies across Russian territory to Afghanistan. Either Moscow got some serious secret payoffs from Washington, or the Kremlin is happy to see the US sink ever deeper into the Afghan morass.

President Obama was politely received in Moscow by a smiling President Dimitri Medvedev and a mostly scowling Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. Their "good cop/bad cop" routine left everyone wondering who was really the boss.

Obama’s golden oratory did not move Russia’s leaders or people. Both remained deeply skeptical of Washington’s professions of friendship and concerned by America’s growing influence around Russia’s borders.

A just-issued World Public Opinion survey finds that opinion of President Obama is generally positive on a personal level and has boosted America’s battered image.

But 66—68% of British, French, Poles, Ukrainians, Iraqis and Egyptians surveyed believed the US was abusing its great power. In Russia, the result was 75%. In two key US allies, an alarming 86% in Turkey, and 90% in Pakistan. These last two figures are very ominous. They show intense public opposition to the pro-US policies of these nations, a recipe for violence or even revolution.

Russia and the Muslim world are waiting to see President Obama turn his professions of change, friendship, and improved relations into actions. Unfortunately, they often seem to be seeing the opposite.

The US is pressing ahead with the Polish/Czech missile project, still says it wants to bring Ukraine and Georgia into NATO, and is expanding American strategic power into former Soviet Central Asian Republics. In short, surrounding Russia on the strategic chessboard. This strategy has played right into the hands of anti-western Russian hardliners and nationalists.

Is Washington really ready to risk a possible nuclear war with Moscow over Georgia, Abkhazia, South Ossetia or Luhansk, Ukraine — places very few Americans could find on a map if their lives depended on it. Building antimissile sites on Moscow’s doorstep is a reckless and pointless provocation. You don’t kick a man in the shins who is holding a gun to your head.

Russians, peoples of the Muslim world, and some Americans are wondering if they are seeing Bushism without Bush?

Half a century ago, President Dwight Eisenhower warned Americans about the growing power of the military-industrial complex. Is the updated version — the financial-military-industrial complex — making US foreign policy no matter who is in the White House?

Hopefully not. But, aside from the thinning of US forces in Iraq, there has been remarkably little change of direction in US foreign policy since Obama took office.

To many of Moscow’s "siloviki" — the hard men of the security complex — it’s Washington’s old "imperialist ruling circles" still hard at work. Back at the Pentagon, there is palpable relief that the "reds" are again running things again in Moscow. The devils you know…

Eric Margolis [send him mail], contributing foreign editor for Sun National Media Canada. He is the author of War at the Top of the World and the new book, American Raj: Liberation or Domination?: Resolving the Conflict Between the West and the Muslim World. See his website.

The Best of Eric Margolis

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare