The Tamil Tigers’ Last Battle
by Eric Margolis by Eric Margolis
PARIS — The Tamil Tigers fought to the last ditch — or, more precisely, a section of swampy beach along Sri Lanka’s Northeast coast. The bloody end of Sri Lanka’s 26-year-old civil war is tragic and appalling. But it may also have been the only way to end that nation’s bitter civil war.
Large numbers of sick, starving, shell-shocked Tamil refugees are being herded into government security compounds. Some estimates put the number at 100,000. The number of civilian dead caused by the government’s final offensive against the last Tamil Tiger redoubt is unknown, but estimates run 6,000—10,000. The government in Colombo blocks all journalists and human rights group from the region.
It seems clear this struggle, which has cost 80,000—100,000 lives since the early 1980’s, is over — at least for now. The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam have been totally defeated.
Standard wisdom has it that conventional armies can’t win guerilla wars. But last week’s defeat of the Tamil Tigers shows there are important exceptions to this general rule.
Three other examples: Russia finally managed to crush the life out of the Chechen independence movement after eighteen years of the most cruel repression in which at least 100,000 Chechen civilians were killed by Russian forces and thousands tortured or "disappeared." Totally isolated and ignored by the world, Muslim Chechnya’s valiant battle for independence was finally snuffed out after almost all of its mujahidin fighters were hunted down and killed, and its population terrorized into silence by a thuggish regime of Moscow’s Quislings.
The US shamefully joined Russia in branding the Chechen independence fighters, "terrorists."
Angola’s anti-Communist UNITA movement fought for 27 years, as I saw myself while covering the bush wars in southern Africa. But after Washington decided that Angola’s Communist regime would be a reliable supplier of oil, it abandoned old ally UNITA. Savimbi was betrayed and assassinated in an ambush by foreign mercenaries (reportedly Israeli). UNITA, isolated in Angola’s remotest regions, collapsed.
The third example was Ukraine in the 1950’s. Its national liberation movement, isolated and unsupported, was ground down and finally exterminated by the Soviet KGB using the most brutal methods.
I’ve followed Sri Lanka’s bitter civil war between majority Sinhalese and minority Tamils since it began 26 years ago. As with those endless disputes between Israelis and Arabs, Indians and Pakistanis, Turks and Armenians, I have great sympathy for both sides and watch these conflicts with deep sorrow.
Oppression of the island’s 3.8 million Hindu Tamils by extremists from the 17-million-strong Sinhalese Buddhist majority, and Tamil demands for a separate Tamil state, sparked civil war. Britain planted the seeds of this conflict by favoring minority Tamils and putting many into plum positions, part of its standard divide and rule policy that has caused so many troubles to our day. Just look, for example, at Afghanistan, India, Pakistan or Sudan.
Sri Lanka’s Tamils are part of the ancient Dravidian race that once dominated India before being driven south by lighter-skinned Indo-European invaders. They are part of a rich, 2,000-year-old culture; Tamil is one of India’s classical languages.
Sixty-six million Tamils live in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu, and six million across southern India. Tamils are found from Southeast Asia to the Caribbean. Canada has one of the world’s largest expatriate Tamil communities.
A portly Tamil militant with no military experience, Vellupillai Prabhakaran, founded and led a guerilla force, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, in a struggle for an independent homeland in eastern Sri Lanka. He soon became a renowned military leader and a powerful cult leader. Tamil moderates seeking peace were caught in a crossfire between government forces and the ferocious Tigers. Prabhakaran ruthlessly wiped out all rivals and those Tamils seeking compromise.
The Tigers, drawn from poor peasants and tea pickers, became one of the world’s most formidable fighting forces, repeatedly defeating the heavily-armed Sri Lankan Army.
The Tigers were originally armed and financed by India, which sought to turn Sri Lanka into a protectorate. But Delhi finally turned against the Tigers and sent 80,000 troops to fight them. To everyone’s amazement, the Tigers whipped the mighty Indian Army and forced it to humiliatingly withdraw from Sri Lanka.
As a former soldier and war correspondent, I marveled at the courage, determination and tactical proficiency of the Tigers, who even had their own tiny navy.
Their reckless courage, use of suicide bombers, and attacks on civilian targets led them to be branded terrorists by many nations, including the US and Canada. Tamil Tiger expatriates became notorious for extortion and heroin dealing to finance their war. In 1991, India’s late prime minister, Rajiv Gandhi, was blown to pieces by a female Tamil Tiger suicide bomber in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu.
Tamils are not "terrorists," as Western governments and Colombo claimed. Nor are their opponents, the Sinhalese. The propaganda term "terrorist" in no way describes this war.
Charges by Tamils that Sri Lanka’s government is practicing genocide are untrue, though its armed forces have caused high civilian casualties. This has been an ugly civil war with constant atrocities committed by both sides. Aside from small arms, the Tamil’s primary weapons were often bombs strapped on their bodies. This was a poor man’s struggle against massive fire power and modern weapons. Civilians were targeted by both sides, or ended up in the crossfire.
As the old saying goes, "war is the rich man’s terrorism; terrorism is the poor man’s war."
This week, the US and Britain piously criticized the Colombo government and demanded it cease military operations in civilian areas. The same US and Britain that just encouraged Pakistan’s brutal attack on the Swat Valley that has so far created 2.3 million refugees.
The Tigers were relentlessly hemmed in by superior forces. Government forces finally cornered the Tigers on the northeast coast and ground them down with heavy artillery, tanks and air strikes. The Tigers fought to the bitter end until leader Prabhakaran was killed.
The Tigers were finally defeated because they ran out of maneuver space. Money, men and arms for the Tigers from the outside world had to run a Sri Lankan and Indian naval blockade. The world turned against Sri Lanka’s Tamils.
History teaches it’s imperative that Sri Lanka’s government in Colombo avoid triumphalism or revenge and be magnanimous in victory. Tamil should be afforded a high level of autonomy — as in India — and ample power sharing in Colombo. There should be no prosecutions of Tiger leaders.
The bitter civil wars in El Salvador and Nicaragua that I also covered were eventually settled by wise and generous political concessions. Sri Lanka needs a similar process.
Unless Colombo is magnanimous in victory, it risks rekindling a low-level insurrection. India’s 70 million plus Tamils are angry at the defeat and suffering of their cousins in Sri Lanka. Many are calling for Indian military intervention.
If Sri Lanka’s Tamils are subjected to a Carthaginian Peace, there is a risk that India’s millions of sympathetic Tamils could become the source of new woes on the beautiful island of Sri Lanka.
Eric Margolis [send him mail], contributing foreign editor for Sun National Media Canada. He is the author of War at the Top of the World and the new book, American Raj: Liberation or Domination?: Resolving the Conflict Between the West and the Muslim World. See his website.