Anarchy and Chaos in Black Communities

Email Print

People often
use anarchy and chaos interchangeably. They refer to civil unrest
as “anarchy, total chaos.” As an anarchist of the anarcho-libertarian
variety myself, naturally, this habit irks me. Anarchy is simply
the absence of forceful authority. Chaos is disorder. The two things
can coexist, but it may be shocking to some to find that the presence
of the one does not imply the presence of the other. Nor does the
absence of the one imply the absence of the other. They are neither
unrelated nor equivalent. And the correlation between the two can
often be surprising. This is particularly true among blacks.

I grew up in
a black, rural community in Mississippi. I have always enjoyed listening
to the stories of the past from my elders. Many of them were relatives
from other cities such as Detroit and Chicago. Others were local,
or from other parts of the South. One common thread among their
reminiscences was the notion that while things were in many ways
worse, since there were legal barriers in place which limited black
property rights, the neighborhoods themselves were safer than the
surrounding areas. In short, blacks were endangered when they encountered
law enforcement or people who had the support of law enforcement,
since those things enabled them to use force against blacks without
fear of retaliation or negative repercussions. Within those black
communities in many areas, however, there was no law enforcement,
unless they had been summoned. The day-to-day life of those blacks,
so long as they remained within their own neighborhoods was essentially
anarchic. The state was what was encountered when one left the neighborhood,
be it for business or pleasure.

Those neighborhoods,
with their localized anarchy, were nonetheless orderly places. The
communities policed themselves through ostracism and familial ties.
There was little disorder within anarchy. Black-owned businesses
served primarily black customers, unless the state intervened to
prevent even that bit of freedom. Even during my own childhood in
the 1970s, police presence in my community was an almost unheard
of occurrence. Crimes and vices were handled among families and
family members. Even though some people could be considered leaders,
those leaders were followed voluntarily. There was no mayor who
forced his edicts upon supporters and opponents alike. Each community
was usually a little pocket of anarchy. The well-known negatives
associated with involving oneself with a hostile state made self-governing
a far better alternative. Consider, however, the situation today:
Blacks often have far more frequent encounters with the state. Everything
is regulated. There is little anarchy. From drug laws and house
raids, which limit what a person can do with his own property and
body, to welfare and subsidized housing, which allow a person who
has not shown the ability to earn his own keep to remained housed,
clothed, and well-fed without having to display character traits
which are necessary to earn those things, the state is a constant
intruder on the social order. And what do we frequently see in those
areas now? Chaos. Disorder. Mayhem. Government.

afflicts many American black neighborhoods and communities today
is not the absence of rules so much as the natural effects of rules
forced upon the unwilling. In stark contrast to the more organic
leadership of church and business leaders of past generations, modern
“leaders” are most frequently bureaucrats or government shills who
profit from government action. Since they profit from the state,
they are naturally disposed to defend the state. This treachery
is clearly on display when we look at how these so-called leaders
endorse two things which are devastating to blacks nationwide: the
war on drugs and welfare. When we look honestly at the actual effects
of these two programs, we see a horror story of nearly unparalleled
proportions. Illegitimacy is rampant largely due to the state’s
subsidizing of irresponsibility. The high levels of violence in
many neighborhoods is almost entirely the product of the barbaric
war on drugs. Despite these things, the misguided, the foolish,
and the downright evil continue to support both of these horrible
assaults on property rights and common decency. Make no mistake:
any black person who is in favor of the war on drugs is morally
defective, mentally defective, or both. The argument for welfare
is the common mistake of all socialists. There is no way to do evil
and produce only good as a result. What these communities, and all
others, need is the elimination of the false, imposed “order” of
the state, and more of the unpredictable, natural true order of
voluntary association. The state, by attempting to control the natural
tendencies of humans to improve themselves and their own conditions,
causes the very chaos it claims to prevent.

This really
should be surprising to no one. Most of us live in homes which are
largely anarchic, yet which have less crime and violence than city
streets, which are completely owned by governments. Far from bringing
chaos, the anarchic portions of our lives are usually the most peaceful
and orderly parts of them. So, when someone asks me “what do you
want, anarchy?” I feel completely justified in saying “I can only

15, 2009

A. Wicks [send him mail]
is a Unix administrator in Atlanta.

Email Print