To: Website Fans, Browsers, Clients From: Jude Wanniski Re: Scott Ritter
pop into Al Jazeera’s English-language website every day or so to check
out their reports and editorials. [I write a monthly column for the Islamic news
network too.] Today I find Scott Ritter, also a regular at the site, warning that
the Pentagon and CIA have already begun planning not only for bombing of Iranian
nuclear power projects, but also an invasion to occupy Tehran. That part sounds
like a stretch to me, but Ritter also offers other troubling info here that fits
with the neo-con game plan.
US war with Iran has already begun By Scott Ritter
along with the rest of the world, are starting to wake up to the uncomfortable
fact that President George Bush not only lied to them about the weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq (the ostensible excuse for the March 2003 invasion and occupation
of that country by US forces), but also about the very process that led to war.
16 October 2002, President Bush told the American people that “I have not ordered
the use of force. I hope that the use of force will not become necessary.”
know now that this statement was itself a lie, that the president, by late August
2002, had, in fact, signed off on the ‘execute’ orders authorising the US military
to begin active military operations inside Iraq, and that these orders were being
implemented as early as September 2002, when the US Air Force, assisted by the
British Royal Air Force, began expanding its bombardment of targets inside and
outside the so-called no-fly zone in Iraq.
operations were designed to degrade Iraqi air defence and command and control
capabilities. They also paved the way for the insertion of US Special Operations
units, who were conducting strategic reconnaissance, and later direct action,
operations against specific targets inside Iraq, prior to the 19 March 2003 commencement
Bush had signed a covert finding in late spring 2002, which authorised the CIA
and US Special Operations forces to dispatch clandestine units into Iraq for the
purpose of removing Saddam Hussein from power.
fact is that the Iraq war had begun by the beginning of summer 2002, if not earlier.
timeline of events has ramifications that go beyond historical trivia or political
investigation into the events of the past.
represents a record of precedent on the part of the Bush administration which
must be acknowledged when considering the ongoing events regarding US-Iran relations.
As was the case with Iraq pre-March 2003, the Bush administration today speaks
of “diplomacy” and a desire for a “peaceful” resolution to the Iranian question.
the facts speak of another agenda, that of war and the forceful removal of the
theocratic regime, currently wielding the reigns of power in Tehran.
with Iraq, the president has paved the way for the conditioning of the American
public and an all-too-compliant media to accept at face value the merits of a
regime change policy regarding Iran, linking the regime of the Mullah’s to an
“axis of evil” (together with the newly “liberated” Iraq and North Korea), and
speaking of the absolute requirement for the spread of “democracy” to the Iranian
and the spread of “democracy” have become none-too-subtle code words within the
neo-conservative cabal that formulates and executes American foreign policy today
for militarism and war.
the intensity of the “liberation/democracy” rhetoric alone, Americans should be
put on notice that Iran is well-fixed in the cross-hairs as the next target for
the illegal policy of regime change being implemented by the Bush administration.
Americans, and indeed much of the rest of the world, continue to be lulled into
a false sense of complacency by the fact that overt conventional military operations
have not yet commenced between the United States and Iran.
such, many hold out the false hope that an extension of the current insanity in
Iraq can be postponed or prevented in the case of Iran. But this is a fool’s dream.
reality is that the US war with Iran has already begun. As we speak, American
over-flights of Iranian soil are taking place, using pilotless drones and other,
more sophisticated, capabilities.
violation of a sovereign nation’s airspace is an act of war in and of itself.
But the war with Iran has gone far beyond the intelligence-gathering phase.
Bush has taken advantage of the sweeping powers granted to him in the aftermath
of 11 September 2001, to wage a global war against terror and to initiate several
covert offensive operations inside Iran.
most visible of these is the CIA-backed actions recently undertaken by the Mujahadeen
el-Khalq, or MEK, an Iranian opposition group, once run by Saddam Hussein’s dreaded
intelligence services, but now working exclusively for the CIA’s Directorate of
is bitter irony that the CIA is using a group still labelled as a terrorist organisation,
a group trained in the art of explosive assassination by the same intelligence
units of the former regime of Saddam Hussein, who are slaughtering American soldiers
in Iraq today, to carry out remote bombings in Iran of the sort that the Bush
administration condemns on a daily basis inside Iraq.
the adage of “one man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist” has finally
been embraced by the White House, exposing as utter hypocrisy the entire underlying
notions governing the ongoing global war on terror.
the CIA-backed campaign of MEK terror bombings in Iran are not the only action
ongoing against Iran.
the north, in neighbouring Azerbaijan, the US military is preparing a base of
operations for a massive military presence that will foretell a major land-based
campaign designed to capture Tehran.
of Defence Donald Rumsfeld’s interest in Azerbaijan may have escaped the blinkered
Western media, but Russia and the Caucasus nations understand only too well that
the die has been cast regarding Azerbaijan’s role in the upcoming war with Iran.
ethnic links between the Azeri of northern Iran and Azerbaijan were long exploited
by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, and this vehicle for internal manipulation
has been seized upon by CIA paramilitary operatives and US Special Operations
units who are training with Azerbaijan forces to form special units capable of
operating inside Iran for the purpose of intelligence gathering, direct action,
and mobilising indigenous opposition to the Mullahs in Tehran.
this is only one use the US has planned for Azerbaijan. American military aircraft,
operating from forward bases in Azerbaijan, will have a much shorter distance
to fly when striking targets in and around Tehran.
fact, US air power should be able to maintain a nearly 24-hour a day presence
over Tehran airspace once military hostilities commence.
longer will the United States need to consider employment of Cold War-dated plans
which called for moving on Tehran from the Arab Gulf cities of Chah Bahar and
Bandar Abbas. US Marine Corps units will be able to secure these towns in order
to protect the vital Straits of Hormuz, but the need to advance inland has been
much shorter route to Tehran now exists – the coastal highway running along the
Caspian Sea from Azerbaijan to Tehran.
military planners have already begun war games calling for the deployment of multi-divisional
forces into Azerbaijan.
planning is well advanced concerning the basing of US air and ground power in
the fact that the bulk of the logistical support and command and control capability
required to wage a war with Iran is already forward-deployed in the region thanks
to the massive US presence in Iraq, the build-up time for a war with Iran will
be significantly reduced compared to even the accelerated time tables witnessed
with Iraq in 2002–2003.
and the Western nations continue to be fixated on the ongoing tragedy and debacle
that is Iraq. Much needed debate on the reasoning behind the war with Iraq and
the failed post-war occupation of Iraq is finally starting to spring up in the
United States and elsewhere.
this would represent a good turn of events. But with everyone’s heads rooted in
the events of the past, many are missing out on the crime that is about to be
repeated by the Bush administration in Iran – an illegal war of aggression, based
on false premise, carried out with little regard to either the people of Iran
or the United States.
Americans, together with the mainstream American media, are blind to the tell-tale
signs of war, waiting, instead, for some formal declaration of hostility, a made-for-TV
moment such as was witnessed on 19 March 2003.
now know that the war had started much earlier. Likewise, history will show that
the US-led war with Iran will not have begun once a similar formal statement is
offered by the Bush administration, but, rather, had already been under way since
June 2005, when the CIA began its programme of MEK-executed terror bombings in
Ritter is a former UN weapons inspector in Iraq, 1991–1998, and author of
Iraq Confidential: The Untold Story of America’s Intelligence Conspiracy, to be
published by I B Tauris in October 2005. This
article can be found online at
Al Jazeera’s website.