How Walgreens Got Me . . . Once

Email Print

of the great things about the free market is that it provides so
many alternatives for the consumer’s money. Because the consumer
possesses money, and because money is best defined as the most marketable
commodity (Ludwig von Mises), the consumer has the upper hand in
most transactions. Whatever the seller is selling, it has a narrower
market than money. I can walk into a store with cash and buy anything
I want at the listed price (except, I discovered, at Walgreens).
In contrast, the seller of anything in a store cannot walk into
any other store and buy anything he wants with whatever he has to

high marketability of money is why the consumer is sovereign in
a free market social order. I mean economically sovereign: the guy
who holds the hammer. I don’t mean legally sovereign. Every owner
is legally sovereign, unless a court or legislature undermines this.
I mean economically sovereign. Maybe we should call this "economic
authority" rather than "economic sovereignty," leaving
sovereignty for the legal sphere.

seller who in any way attempts to evade free market causation —
the final authority of the buyer — is asking for trouble. He
is asking for reduced profitability. If he can persuade the buyer
to part with some of his money-based authority, fine. That, too,
is a matter of voluntary contract. But the classic mark of a seller
who does not understand profit and loss is his attempt to hoodwink
the buyer. Buyers tend to be unforgiving, especially first-time

can learn what to do in our own sales efforts by observing what
not to do in action. So, I offer you the story of my first (and
last) experience with Walgreens.


recently moved to a new city. I have now, for the first time, seen
Walgreens in action. Walgreens stores are everywhere. In my drive
to church down the area’s main street, going through three small
cities, I find four Walgreens. The first one is across the street
from the church. The fourth is a couple of blocks farther down from
my cross street onto the main drag. Only Dollar General matches
Walgreens in sheer numbers of stores on that street.

have never before lived in a town with a Walgreens, but I have known
about the company for most of my adult life. Walgreens put up the
money to endow an economics professorship at the University of Chicago.
George Stigler, who won the Nobel Prize, held that job for decades.
I recall this because Stigler once attacked me in print for not
knowing what I was talking about. He was wrong, and I was right,
so why didn’t the Nobel Committee give me the Nobel Prize —
or at least the tax-free million dollars? Anyway, I never blamed
Walgreens for Stigler’s confusion.

note: What ever happened to possessives? Why don’t they call Walgreens
Walgreen’s or Walgreens’? Why don’t they call Albertsons Albertson’s
or Albertsons’? This is capitalism. Let’s have some marks of ownership!
Make it plain to everyone: "This store is mine (ours)!"

I walked into my first Walgreens this week. I was looking for a
bottle of over-the-counter eye drops, a product line that I had
never before purchased.

amazed me was the amount of floor space devoted to non-drug-related
items: magazines, toys, paperback books, toothpaste, junk food.
It was a big store. Way in the back was a pharmacist and half a
wall of over-the-counter products.

like Wal-Mart, Sam’s Club, Costco, and other low-price warehousing
operations, is governed by this rule for customers: "Find it
yourself." There are lots of things to buy but very few sales
people on the floor to show you where to look. In the case of the
Walgreens I walked into, there was only one: the manager. But there
were not many customers, either.

takes longer to buy something in one of these warehouse operations
than it does at a local 7-11 or mom and pop shop. In this world
of scarcity, sellers can allocate in one of two ways: price or time.
It’s either "high bid wins" or "stand in line."
The lower the price, the longer it will take you to make a purchase,
other things (such as your preferred shopping hour) being equal.


found a shelf with eye drop products. There were many brands, many
bottle sizes, and many prices. I started looking at the list of
contents on the boxes. The list was the same, in the same order,
for every product.

my attention moved to bottle size. I didn’t want too much. If this
stuff won’t cure my problem — or allow time to cure it —
then I will go to a physician and get a prescription for something

I was now a shopper based on price.

bottles caught my attention. There were two differently named products,
both with a Walgreens brand. They
were identical in contents and identical in price: $3.29.

third product was Visine. In front of the double row of Visine bottles
was a blue label: "Sale price: $2.99."
Being a bargain shopper, I bought it.

I took it to the front of the store, the girl used the bar code
scanner. It charged me $4.29, plus tax. That seemed too high. But
I paid. Stupid me.

I went back to the pharmacist’s assistant and said the price was
too high. She called the manager. It took several minutes for him
to show up. He had the authority to make the refund. He decided
to check the price. I walked over with him. There it was: $2.99.

had an explanation. "That sale price ended yesterday."
He refused to let me buy it for $2.99.

tag did not indicate a time limit.

told him: "This is my first experience with Walgreens. It is
also my last." He walked away. He did not bother to pull down
the sale price tag.

wrong with this sales strategy? Let me list the ways.


have learned over the years that very few companies systematically
and relentlessly honor the fundamentals of marketing. That’s because
all of the rules of marketing come back to the same free market
principle: the economic authority of the consumer.

resist this principle, right up to the "going out of business"
sale. Sellers are in business to feather their own nests. Most of
them regard customers as a necessary evil. Their sales policies
and practices reflect this.

for the benefit of sellers everywhere — and if you earn a living,
you are a seller — here are the basics of successful selling.
They all are an extension of this principle: "The customer,
possessing money, holds the economic hammer."

  1. Word of
    mouth is the most cost-effective form of marketing. (With the
    Internet, it’s word of mouse.)
  2. The customer
    is always right, unless he is trying to cheat you, and even then
    you probably ought to go along with him anyway, once.
  3. Identify
    your ideal customer, and structure everything that your company
    does to meet his/her demands.
  4. If a price
    is listed, honor it — no bait and switch, no "that sale
    ended yesterday."
  5. Offer a
    money-back guarantee or "we’ll fix it free of charge"
  6. The value
    of a customer is the profit generated by the number of repeat
    sales (the lifetime value of the customer).
  7. The first
    sale is the most expensive one for a seller to generate.
  8. Profitability
    is in repeat sales (the back end).
  9. Repeat customers
    are more forgiving.
  10. Don’t carry
    a product line that repeatedly alienates customers.
  11. Keep all
    sales records in a data base.
  12. Use the
    data base to spot successes and problems.
  13. Use the
    data base to make special offers to the ideal customers you want
    to return.
  14. The customer
    evaluates the entire company through the people he deals with
    in the store.
  15. Train your
    entire staff to understand these principles.
  16. Create a
    system of ongoing rewards and punishments that reinforces this
  17. Implement
    this system.
  18. Begin at
    the top.


lowly manager made a mistake. He saved Walgreens $1.30 ($4.29
$2.99). But he reduced the lifetime value of this customer to the
profit margin involved a single $4.29 sale.

for word of mouse. . . .

he be disciplined? Not until after David Bernauer is disciplined.
Mr. Bernauer is Chairman and CEO of Walgreens. He sets the standards.
He sets the pattern for every other employee. He evaluates the company’s
policies. He approves or disapproves the company’s in-house training.
On his desk should be the sign that Harry Truman had on his: "The
buck stops here."

a press release dated September
27, 2004
, Walgreens provided a standard happy face report. It
focused on numbers — lots and lots of numbers. Walgreens is
spending a lot of money on infrastructure.

is budgeting approximately $1.5 billion in capital investments
for fiscal 2005. This reflects expenditures for new stores (including
more planned real estate purchases), technology and a new distribution
center in South Carolina scheduled to open in 2007. The company
anticipates a fiscal 2005 net increase of about 365 stores after
closings and relocations. The goal for total openings in the year
is about 450.

growth created 9,000 new jobs in fiscal 2004, and we’ll create
a similar number of new jobs in fiscal 2005," said Rein.

Aug. 31, Walgreens operated 4,582 drugstores in 44 states and
Puerto Rico, versus 4,227 a year ago.

are some more numbers. Since its peak price in 2000, Walgreens share
price has gone nowhere, except down, then up. It is back where it
was five years ago. This is not too bad when compared to other companies,
whose share prices are lower, but it is hardly anything to write
home to mom about.

company has spent billions on real estate and capital development.
But it did not spend nearly enough on in-house training. I have
a $4.29 bottle of Visine as proof.

is what I found fascinating: Walgreens profitability is in selling

which accounted for 63 percent of sales in fiscal 2004, climbed
16.4 percent in the fourth quarter and 17.8 percent for the year.
Prescription sales in comparable stores rose 12.5 percent in the
quarter and 14.0 percent for the year.

are these large stores, built on high-priced corner lots on main
streets, that are filled with non-prescription stuff to buy, yet
the core business remains prescriptions.

and CEO David Bernauer said, "Though there was some softening
industry-wide this year in prescription demand because of higher
co-pays, we continued to record strong gains. In the long term
prescription growth will be fueled by aging baby boomers and new
drug development, and will become more important to controlling
overall health care costs."

this, at least 90% of the floor space and inventory of a Walgreens
store is devoted to ancillary sales items. Even its
online store
sells these low-profit-margin items.

Because Walgreens has a marketing strategy: to get old, sick people
to come back, again and again, to buy their prescriptions at Walgreens.
Walgreens therefore fills a store with peripheral shopping items.
"As long as you’re here, buy something else."

layout of the stores reveals the company’s marketing strategy. The
stuff on the shelves is bait. The hook is the pharmacy. That is
where the profits are.

stuff on the shelves has one overriding function: to persuade the
aging boomers to walk, then hobble, into a Walgreens store and buy
some pills.

conclusion: Walgreens is a for-profit economic extension of Medicare.
Everything else is for show.

respect to shelf space inventory, the importance of any one item
to the company’s bottom line is minimal. It can barely be measured.
What is crucial is the customer’s overall experience in the store.

customer can buy at rival warehouse-type drugstores. He can also
buy at a true warehouse: a Wal-Mart Supercenter, which has a pharmacy.
He can buy online.

should he buy at Walgreens? Location: a nearby corner lot. One-stop
shopping. Low prices — though not compared to online pharmacies,
especially in Canada.

shouldn’t he buy at Walgreens? "Find it yourself." "That
sale ended yesterday."

an extra $1.30, Walgreens guaranteed that this aging pre-boomer
is not going to bring his Medicare-funded prescription to be filled
at Walgreens. Ever. That is because of my first-time Walgreens experience.
That experience told me this — not logically, but emotionally:

Walgreens doesn’t care enough about a customer’s experience in
its stores to train its managers to stand behind the "sale"
signs on the shelves, then I why should I trust Walgreens’ pharmacists?
I’ve never spoken to one of the pharmacists, but I’ve spoken to
a manager, and he was so poorly trained that he did not know that
a sale sign is an offer to sell at a specified price. A poorly
trained manager cost me $1.30. A poorly trained pharmacist could
kill me. Next time, I’ll go to Wal-Mart. They offer a money-back
guarantee, no questions asked.

Bernauer forgot to implement what should have been obvious: a money-back
guarantee. For all shelf items, this is crucial to the Walgreens
experience. It will cost the company almost nothing to offer this
benefit and then redeem the pledge. Furthermore, the data on refunds
will alert the company to any looming problem. The underlying problem
may involve a quality control failure with the product line. A pattern
of refunds will reveal this. A money-back guarantee offers Walgreens
an early warning alert for products that may jeopardize the Walgreens

there are jerk customers. But the number of jerk customers is a
small fraction of the number of run-of-the-mill repeat customers.
Dealing with jerks is a cost of doing business. So is dealing with
confused people. In Walgreens, so is dealing with people who can’t
find what they are looking for. These expenses have to be factored
into the business plan. How to deal with them should be a section
in the training manual.

mistake made by that young man on the floor was not primarily his
mistake. It was Mr. Bernauer’s. Mr. Bernauer has not implemented
a training program that made clear and nearly automatic the correct
response of this store manager to a problem like mine. That response
is simple to state: "I’ll sell it to you at the tag price.
The reason the computer charged you more is because the sale ended
yesterday, but no one remembered to remove the tag." This explains
why the computer charged a different price. Mistakes happen. He
then removes the tag in front of the customer. Then he proceeds
directly to the cash register to refund the difference in cash or
else re-run the program at the sale price. Simple. Fast. And, in
the long run, profitable.

time was worth far more than the value of the refund. So was his,
had he made the refund. But customers don’t like to be tricked.
They don’t care that some clerk forgot to take down the sales tag
last night. A deal’s a deal. A seller who ignores a customer’s commitment
to not being taken advantage of will make less money.

Bernauer has not made this fact clear to every store manager, as
I discovered. He has not cared enough about his customers to do
right by his managers. He has not provided them with the guidelines
they need, the training they need, and the in-store feedback mechanisms
they need to be top-flight managers.

someone in the marketing division put this message on-line under
the rubric, "Marketing Systems."

Look At A Walgreens Store The Same Way Again

can bet your bottom $1.30, I won’t!

mission of our department is to improve Walgreens return on inventory
investment, by providing systems and support services that measure
merchandising and pipeline activities.

activities? Walgreens is beginning to sound like OPEC — and
act like it, in my case.

here learn all facets of store merchandising, from store system
preparation to product placement and ordering; everything that
happens behind the scenes to improve customer satisfaction.

happens on the scene matters a whole lot more than what the in-house
computer gurus have set up behind the scene.

the rule: "If you don’t sell it, Walgreens’ inventory return
on investment on that item will be negative."


the computerized sales receipt, there is a message, right under
"Walgreens." It announces: "The Pharmacy America
Trusts." This vapid, empty claim probably elicits no response
by the customer, except possibly this one: "yeah,

is a multibillion-dollar company that has adopted a useless slogan
for itself. The slogan is ludicrous. Who is "America"?
What scientifically valid survey was ever taken to find out whether
"America" trusts Walgreens as "the" pharmacy?
How recently was it taken?

no such survey was taken, is it fair to say "The Pharmacy an
Unknown Number of Americans Trust"?

Walgreens responds, "That’s just sales copy. We don’t actually
expect anyone to believe it," then I suggest that the company
shell out a few thousand bucks and hire someone with expertise in
direct-response marketing to come up with a meaningful benefit to
offer customers. I offer the following, free of charge:

money-back guarantee, no exceptions, ever

off on your next refill if your prescription isn’t filled in 15
[or whatever] minutes

pay prescription postage fees for our bedridden customers

the customer a good reason to shop at Walgreens again. Put this
on his sales receipt.

of the promise of a benefit, the company has offered a slogan. The
slogan is just noise.

use advertising space for an unverified slogan that nobody is likely
to believe? When the customer’s mental response, if any, is likely
to be "yeah, sure," it’s better not to print the slogan.
This is one of those rare cases where you really can beat something
with nothing.

to keep a stack of brochures at the check-out counter. Have the
counter lady put the item in a bag and insert a flyer, brochure,
or discount coupon. Or make the shopping bag itself a discount coupon
for the Walgreens Deal of the Month.

she handed me a slogan.


isn’t a bad company. No company that big is bad. But the company
is facing tremendous competition on-line and from Wal-Mart Supercenters.
To do such dumb cluck things as I have described sends a message:
"We ignore the obvious. Our market share is vulnerable."

you do, do it better than Walgreens, beginning with this: Don’t
bet your future on Medicare.

P.S. As of 2006, I still get emails every month from Walgreens’
managers telling me that I should not judge the company by one incident.
But when I first published this essay, I received letters from ex-Walgreens’
customers who said that the same thing had happened to them. This
issue is training or the lack thereof, not “one bad apple.” I now
shop at Rite-Aid. So far, so good.

23, 2005

North [send him mail] is the
author of Mises
on Money
. Visit

North Archives

Email Print