The War Justified

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare

I
don’t believe human beings can predict the future reliably. So for
my final 20 years in the investment business, I never made a forecast.
But one future event seems about as certain to me as anything could
possibly be.

After the Iraqi elections this weekend,
when the U.S.-installed interim Iraqi Prime Minister Ayad Allawi’s
party has amazingly won the most seats
, the war team in Washington
– along with a good part of the media – will somehow see the completion
of the elections as a great victory for George Bush, a confirmation
that his decision to invade Iraq was the right choice after all.

They did this when Baghdad fell, they did it when Hussein was captured,
they did it when "sovereignty" was turned over to the
Iraqis last June, and I can’t imagine that they won’t do it when
Iraq holds its first free elections! in history. Of course,
we here in America will have no evidence available that these elections
will have been any more free than the elections held during Saddam
Hussein’s regime. But no matter. All that counts is appearance,
and the appearance will prove that George Bush was right all along.

It’s as though we who opposed the war did so because we said the
U.S. military could never defeat the Iraqi army and capture Baghdad,
that the U.S. could never capture Hussein, that the U.S. could never
appoint some Iraqis to ceremonial positions in the occupation, and
that the Iraqis couldn’t hold an election. And now we have to admit
how wrong we’ve been proven to be!

What
everyone knows

Forgive
me for repeating something I’ve said before, and before, and before.
But in reporting Tuesday’s Senate debate on the nomination of Condoleezza
Rice to be Secretary of State, some Democrats blasted Rice as being
part of the team that made the false claims that led to the Iraqi
War.
CNN reports
:

Sen.
John Warner, a Virginia Republican, defended Rice, calling attacks
on her integrity "somewhat astonishing" and noting that
many governments had considered Iraq "a grave and gathering
threat."

The only reason that many governments had considered Iraq "a
grave and gathering threat" was because the U.S. government
claimed it had overwhelming evidence that Iraq was "a grave
and gathering threat." I really doubt that Poland or Spain
or the United Nations or Portugal or South Korea – much less Micronesia
or the Marshall Islands – had its own CIA operatives in Iraq discovering
evidence of mobile laboratories and unmanned airplanes that could
drop biological weapons on the East Coast of the United States.

It is an old tactic to dispense false information, and then cite
those who repeat the false information as evidence that your disinformation
has been independently verified.

January
28, 2005

Harry Browne [send
him mail
], the author of Why
Government Doesn’t Work

and many other books, was the Libertarian presidential candidate
in 1996 and 2000. See his website.

Harry
Browne Archives

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare
  • LRC Blog

  • LRC Podcasts