Vive la France!

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare

I've
noticed that it is very much de rigueur to mock the French
these days. Jonah Goldberg, whom one would suppose would look inward
for someone to mock, does this regularly. It is considered good
sport on Free Republic and a personal survey of friends and acquaintances
reveals a great deal of contempt on their part for all things French.

The
recent success of Jean-Marie Le Pen has provoked an outpouring of
rage from all the usual left wing suspects, and astonishingly, from
some Jews. Justin
Raimondo seems to be the only one to see the irony in this
.
In a world where Muslims are attacking synagogues and beating Jews
in the street, it is with a sense of wonder that I consider the
Jewish resistance to Le Pen whose sin is to oppose having his country
swamped by those same Muslims.

To
understand Le Pen, it might help for folks to read Jean Larteguy's
classics, The Centurions and The Praetorians, which
chronicle the French Paratroops and their fight against the communists
in Indochina and Algeria. One may criticize le Paras (and
their comrades in the Foreign Legion) but to mock their military
prowess is a sin. Le Pen was a soldier in the elite 10th
Paratroop Division which should tell anyone all they need to know
about him. Algerie Francais was the rallying cry in those
days but those days are gone and now it's the Algerians who are
conquering France!

I remain astonished that people mock the French as reluctant soldiers
good only for surrendering en masse. I suppose I should know better,
public schooling being what it is these days. Perhaps we should
try a history lesson and consider some contradictions in the American
mentality.

There
was only one possible reason for the US to enter World War I on
the side of the allies, and that was out of a sense of loyalty to
France, not the miserable English who once again were committing
piracy on the high seas. Lacking far sighted diplomats we failed
to see that this would inevitably harm even those for whom we supposedly
went to war. You see in those days, Americans still had a sense
of history — we remembered who had helped us gain our independence
from the hated British. Our troops arrived in France and the headlines
blared "Lafayette, we are here!"

These
were the same French people who had sent us the gift of the Statue
of Liberty, and upon whom we had modeled our army and much else.
French was indeed, the primary foreign language taught at West Point
for many years for the simple reason that France was considered
the military power of the world. Waterloo only enhanced the
glory of France, much to the astonishment of the English who claimed
the battle as an "English Victory" even though they contributed
but a fraction of the troops on the field. The French won the glory,
the Germans won the battle, and the British took the credit.

There
would have been no victory at Yorktown (and no United States) had
not Admiral de Grasse's fleet and Rochambeau's soldiers arrived
in time to seal the blockade and trap the British Army. (Rochambeau
would later die in combat fighting for Napoleon at the Battle of
the Nations — Leipzig, in 1813.)

The
gallant Lafayette struggled against the horrors of the French Revolution
when it convulsed into the Terror and continued to strive to bring
freedom to his country, even when the fat king, Louis XVIII, was
enthroned by Allied bayonets.

There
is no denying that the original ideals of the French Revolution
were greatly influenced by what the soldiers had learned fighting
beside us in our own struggle for freedom. After the initial purges
and disorder the French Army had gradually morphed into a force
to be reckoned with — throwing back the Austrians, Prussians, Russians,
and English, sometimes simultaneously.

The
Allied coalitions who warred on France were all financed by England,
a country that had a stake in making the world safe for despotism,
coupled with a reluctance to spill English blood.

Can
military history be discussed with a mention of "The Corsican
Ogre," the great Napoleon? Yes he was the first of the modern
dictators, and ultimately he suppressed hard-won civil liberties
and drowned Europe in blood. Yet until 1808 he was more sinned against
than sinning. His despotic powers in no way exceeded those of Franz,
Alexander, Wilhelm, and the mad king George III, none of whom mitigated
their rule with anything like the Code Napoleon which at
least insured a level of civil liberty far ahead of that of any
country in the world except America. Napoleon, despite his political
battles with the Pope, restored the Catholic Church in France which
had been suppressed during the excesses of the Terror. America was
his ally and we purchased Louisiana and much else from him.

In
1808 when Napoleon foolishly invaded Spain, he bought his country
much misery. Until then, the Napoleonic Wars were wars of aggression
against the French, initiated by despotic monarchs alarmed
by the French concepts of liberty, equality and fraternity. The
French Army, hardened by the wars of the revolution, was the finest
fighting force the world would encounter before 1940 and Napoleon
was the master who made such brilliant use of that tool. Corrupted
by power, Napoleon betrayed his people and his soldiers with his
wars in Spain and Russia, but this in no way detracts from the glory
his soldiers achieved on the battlefield.

For
those who mock the French defeat in 1940 it might pay to consider
what the French did to the Prussians in 1806! There has rarely been
a more complete victory than that achieved by the French at the
twin battles of Jena / Auerstadt. The blitzkrieg that followed took
Prussia down in approximately the same time frame as Nazi Germany
took down France in 1940. They did it without motor vehicles or
tanks which considering the pace of warfare in those days is truly
astonishing. In 1813 the Prussians repaid him in kind, having learned
the lessons of warfare the hard way. The Germans have always been
fighters but it is fair to say that Napoleon's Grande Armee
taught them to be soldiers.

One
studies this time period and it becomes all too clear that the victors
write the history. The battles in Spain were a sideshow yet well
over half the English language books written on the Napoleonic era
chronicle either the Peninsula War or the battle of Waterloo. Yet
even at Waterloo the actual number of British troops was barely
fifteen thousand. Those folks like to fight by proxy.

Which
brings me to my point: why do we consider England a natural ally,
and France virtually an enemy? In our revolution and again in 1812
we were fighting as allies of France against the hated British!
It was the British who despised us and tried to topple us and contested
with us for Maine and Oregon and mocked us as backwoods hillbillies,
unworthy of a place in the family of nations.

It
was Britain who tricked us into sacrificing one hundred thousand
of our best men in that horror called The War To End All Wars. It
was the English who conspired with the traitor Roosevelt to involve
us in World War II. And it has been the English who have lead the
charge to open the gates of civilization to the Islamic immigrants
who now threaten to subsume us, not be feeble acts of terrorism,
but by sheer numbers.

So
we make fun of France for losing so ignominiously in World War II,
forgetting that the French had literally lost an entire generation
in the First World War II and had little left to give. Feeble as
France had become, they none the less went to war against the fearsome
Wehrmacht because their ally Poland was in danger. Surely there
is some honor in that?

Now
France is again in trouble because the French ambassador to London
complained that the world was being drawn into war over a "shitty
little country." Since that country happens to be Israel —
there has been a huge outcry against the alleged anti-Semitism of
the French. Yet France was one of the first countries to give Jews
full rights as citizens. Not to mention the harsh fact that the
key part of the statement is quite literally true. Whether the war
is the fault of the Israelis or the Arabs is hardly the point —
the world is on the brink of war and that cannot be disputed.

M.
Le Pen actually supports Israel's right to defend itself yet is
called anti-Semitic simply because he is a member of the political
right! How convenient it is to forget that the pogroms of the twentieth
century were manifestations of left wing politics — to those who
think only in sound bites I remind you that Nazi stands for "National
Socialist Workers Party!"

So
we have the hilarious contradiction of the press whose minions slander
the French as anti-Semitic when they criticize Israel and again
when they condemn the mass migration of Arabs into the French heartland.
The attacks on Jews in France have all been perpetrated by
Muslims. Le Pen wants to stop Arab immigration — thus he is an anti-Semite!
Warning! Warning! This does not compute!

There
is a certain charm to the French character that cannot be denied.
There is a story of the Cold War, when the Soviets had released
a new and fearsome tank. Everyone was panicking and it was determined
that information must be obtained. The Americans launched a satellite
for the purpose of tracking this beast, at a cost of millions. The
British sent an SAS team into East Germany — they broke into a tank
and stole the manuals — for the cost of a replacement lock. The
French were more civilized about the whole thing. Their military
attaché called his Soviet counterpart: "I've been hearing
about this fascinating new tank — may I see it?" The Russian
took him on a guided tour and let him drive the darn thing!

Where
else in the world do the people eat and drink like it matters, yet
retain those infuriatingly slender waist lines? Who else would have
canceled an important diplomatic event with the Iranians, simply
because the Iranians objected to the French tradition of having
wine with their meals? Is it possible that the traditions of a Western
country might actually matter? The French thought so. Contrast this
with Walter Mondale's hilarious farce of a performance at a political
rally for Hispanics, where he ate his tamale, wrapper and all, claiming
it to be among his favorite foods! Some folks might call that pandering.

Can
a freedom-loving Johnny Reb like me be a fan of Jean Marie le Pen?
After all, despite his fearsome reputation with the limp-wrested
aficionados of political correctness, he is far to the left of me.
Yet a man who wishes to preserve his own country's culture and history
cannot be all bad — I share those beliefs and wish him the best.
My real question is when will an American politician stand up for
us? Is our Republic and our history not worth defending? We certainly
can't count on that ridiculous Senor Bush!

Yes
I have my moments when I find the French quite as annoying as everyone
else seems to. But what a dull world it would be without them. And
now I must get back to work — I'm laboriously translating a French
military history, The E'popee Napoleonienne, one chapter
at a time. It's a fascinating exercise and French is after all,
the language of soldiers!

May
4, 2002

Mr. Peirce [send
him mail
] fought with the Rhodesian freedom fighters (the Ian
Smith side, of course).

Michael
Peirce Archives

LewRockwell.com
needs your help. Please donate.

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare
  • LRC Blog

  • LRC Podcasts