Time and Justice

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare

Hit-in-the-head
movies are usually pathetic. Some guy takes a fall and learns
to see the world a new way, which invariably involves becoming
more politically correct and marrying a feminist or some such.
"Memento" is not to be confused with one of these. It
is surely one of the most brilliant and innovative films to come
along in years.

I
can only compare my reaction to "Memento" to the first
time I saw "Godfather": here is something completely
new and unexpected, yet completely integrated and successful,
that sheds all new light on the medium and the subject. That subject
is time and how we perceive it. But it goes beyond that to touch
even on the moral universe. This movie is so good, and so smart,
that you want to watch the whole thing over again just as it ends.

"Memento"
is a thriller that tells the story of Leonard Shelby (played by
Guy Pearce), who has the mission of finding and killing the survivor
of two men who broke into his home raped and killed his wife.
Leonard suffered a head injury in the attack, so now he has this
"condition": he has no short-term memory. He knows who
he is and where he is from. He knows that he was a happy husband
and a claims investigator for a life-insurance company. But he
cannot remember anything after the terrifying night when his wife
was attacked. He does know that he has this memory problem and
that he must seek vengeance.

Despite
this crippling problem, he is determined to carry on. Because
he cannot form new memories, he must snap photos of things he
wants to recall later on. He carries pictures of the hotel he
is staying at, the car he drives, and people he meets. He must
make judgements about the character of people and write them down,
because he knows that the next time he sees them, he will not
remember their name or face. Once something is written down on
a photo, or tattooed to his body, it is fixed in place. If it
is not written down, the information is lost.

Each
day he wakes up unsure about where he is and what he is supposed
to do. He must reorient himself completely, not to remind himself
of what he knows but to form a complete impression from scratch.
He looks in the mirror to read that his purpose in life is to
find the man or men who killed his wife. He finds notes, written
the previous day, that tell him where to go and who to meet, and
why he should meet them and whether he can trust him. His memory
fades far more quickly than 24 hours, however. It appears to last
about 10 to 15 minutes, so Leonard has to rush to keep himself
on track, and so does the viewer of this film.

Leonard
explains that there are advantages to living this way. Memory
is notoriously unreliable as a guide, he says. But we can trust
facts, and he records facts about the attacker as he finds them.
This, he says, puts him in the same position as a police investigator
who must put emotional distance between himself and the crime.
He discovers the facts and with the aid of the police report,
he pieces together the mystery to find the person he is after.
He seems to get closer and closer to solving the mystery.

Leonard
is once asked why he wants kill the attacker, since, after all,
even if he finds the guy and kills him, Leonard is not likely
to remember it. Leonard responds very intelligently. It's true,
he says, that he may not remember. But vengeance is not a subjective
state of mind but rather a fact of reality. So it doesn't actually
matter whether he carries with him the subjective sense. What
matters is that justice is done, period.

We
cheer. In fact, we admire him because, all in all, Leonard seems
to manage very well with his condition. We follow him in hot pursuit
of the bad guy through many very intense scenes, and in this respect
the film is old-fashioned. In one very funny scene, he is fleeing
a man who is trying to gun him down and suddenly his memory fades.
He thinks to himself: "Okay, what are we doing here? I'm
chasing this man….no, wait, he is chasing me!"

Oh,
but there's a bit more to it. You see, the film is cut up into
some 30 or 40 separate pieces, and the viewer watches the film
in backwards chronology, starting with the last scene first. At
each scene, the viewer finds himself in a completely unfamiliar
setting, which we then must back out of to discover how it is
that we got there in the first place. As the action proceeds,
or recedes, we know only what Leonard knows and only a fraction
of what everybody else in the film knows about the same people
and events.

To
keep the story line stitched together requires that the viewer
juggle scenes and dates, remembering places and characters from
previous scenes that are actually in the future. This technique
places the viewer in something like the same psychological state
of mind as Leonard: a radical disorientation of time and place.
We struggle to orient ourselves at roughly the same pace as Leonard.
To top it off, there is a parallel story line that runs underneath
(shown in black and white) that moves in forward chronology, until
the forward and backward stories meet in the end (which is the
beginning of the story).

The
overall effect is spectacular. I know of no movie that is more
flattering to the intelligence of the viewer. But I don't want
to create an impression that this is some typical art-house psychodrama
about the human condition. It's a corkscrew of a movie, but it
truly works from top to bottom with not a hint of pseudo-profundity.
You can't help but be intensely curious about every aspect of
Leonard's life and how he handles it. You have to be, for if you
turn your attention away even for a moment, you could miss some
crucial piece of information.

What
do we gain from this film? We come away with an understanding
of how central the passage of time, and the gathering of information,
is for our subjective impressions of the world. The ability to
do this differs from person to person, and our own personal sense
of the passage of time has the most powerful effect on how we
behave, on how we regard our place in the social and moral order.

If
that were all this movie was about, we might just dismiss the
film as a typical lefty effort to say that the world is no more
or less than what we make of it in our own minds. But no, this
film doesn't stop there: it shows that no matter how we perceive
time or events, there is an objective world, even an objective
ethic, out there we must confront and cannot avoid. There is truth,
whether we or not we see it and even if we choose not to see it–even
if we cannot see it.

There's
a political dimension here too. We learn that artificially shortened
time horizons (which is what Leonard had and what government imposes
on society through, e.g., inflation and welfare) creates internal
panic and external chaos. We come to understand the degree to
which civilization depends on the ability to plan for the long-term,
accumulate information, make sound judgements based on that information,
learn from error, and reverse our course of action if the need
presents itself.

You
sometimes hear of great movies that you must rush to see them
on the big screen. It's probably not true with this one, so you
can wait until the DVD comes out. It is a low-budget number Newmarket
films, and has no special visual effects and no sex scenes and
very little violence (but it is still rated R).

But
judging by its numbers, audiences have warmed to it right away.
After 14 weeks, it has grossed $17 million and stayed in the top
15. The number of theaters in which it is released broadens by
the day. Writer/director Chris Nolan has done something spectacular
here, and he deserves to be rewarded with commercial success.

June
20, 2001

Jeffrey
Tucker [send him mail]
is vice president of the Mises Institute.

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare
  • LRC Blog

  • LRC Podcasts