Prole Models?

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare

In
a recent essay Prole
Models: America's Elites Take Their Cues From the Underclass
,
Charles Murray bemoans the obvious decline in the moral standards
of American culture. He cites Gertrude Himmelfarb, and Arnold Toynbee
in his search for explanations for this phenomenon. Still, Murray
seems to be at a loss to give us the central reason for this slide
into decadence. After thinking over his article, I can give him
some pointers.

When
did I start my own moral decline? When did I start using foul and
offensive language, act irresponsibly, drink too much, and consort
with women of easy or negligible virtue? Fortunately for this inquiry,
I can pinpoint the exact date. It was 26 June, 1968. How can I be
so precise as to when I started to tumble into the ethical abyss?
That is when I lost my status as a free lower middle class young
guy, and was put in thralldom to the U.S. military. I soon found
that the military puts little or no value on civilized ethics, and
in order to foster the success of their missions, does all that
it can to destroy them. The basics of military actions are killing
people and destroying property. You might note that this is exactly
the opposite of what is required to maintain civil society. We wind
up, then, with the strange paradox that we seem to need to destroy
virtue in order to defend it. Some people have thought it ridiculous
when a hapless military information officer told the world that
we had to destroy a Vietnamese village to save it. Yet, this is
what we are told to believe about our own military and its mission.

So,
in the process of transforming a conscript into a proper soldier,
we tend to weaken, if not eliminate those characteristics that Murray,
and other civilized people hold dear. Take language, for example.
While there have been a few saintly military leaders such as George
Washington or Robert E. Lee who were well spoken, they are few and
far between. The more dominant strain is in the tradition of von
Steuben and Patton. Foul and abusive language is considered a part
of macho manhood, and is fostered in the military forces. Another
area of concern is sexual morality. The greater probability of violent
death gives combat military personnel a long standing tendency towards
sexual promiscuity. The fact that you are far away from home also
gives those so inclined a license to engage in behaviors that their
mothers warned them about. Mom is not likely to find out about her
offspring's rash indiscretions if he, or she, is thousands of miles
away. Then, too, there is good sportsmanship, which quickly falls
by the wayside in combat. Furthermore, as Lew Rockwell has noted
in the past, the areas surrounding military bases tend to cater
to base desires, and irresponsible people. These offerings would
not be there if there were not an immoral customer base resident
there. Multiplying the moral degradation visited on each member
of the military forces by the millions who have been through them
gives a plausible cause for the moral decline posited by Mr. Murray.

This
is not to say that all veterans are moral degenerates. Some are.
Some were tainted before their military experience. My own experience
is that the intense nature of military duty tends to create bad
habits, such as foul language, that are very hard to break later.
Several years after discharge, I went in for oral surgery, where
I was put under with an anesthetic. When I came back to get the
stitches removed, no one there would talk to me. It must have been
something I said. Most of us have been able to regain most of our
former morals, but not, alas, completely.

With
the moral corrosiveness inherent in military service, it would make
sense to limit it as much as possible. Ideally, we would have local
military units who would train together for defense of home and
hearth. What with these military units being local, and not transported
far away for training or fighting, there would not be the anonymity
required for most of the moral decrepitude to flourish. Local standards
would most likely prevail, and the activities of the units would
be well known throughout the area. This is what we had until about
1861. What has happened since then is that the Republic wilted,
and an empire took its place. The culture was increasingly militarized,
and locality was largely demolished. The increasingly martial demands
of the empire have uprooted literally millions of Americans, damaged
their morals, and permanently planted many of them at an early age
in foreign places.

The
elites mentioned by Mr. Murray were generally able to shield their
sons from these damaging circumstances by the aptly named Selective
Service System. Still, many others were not so fortunate. The survivors,
discovered that they could now go through school on the GI Bill.
The more capable, though still no longer morally pristine graduates,
have been able to climb to high levels in the civilian hierarchy,
and could often challenge the more cowardly non-veteran elites.
Combining this with the increasingly nihilistic and relativistic
worldviews of the elites, it is not surprising that the codes of
the gentleman and lady have fallen into disuse. Nice guys finish
last, you know. One thing I have not figured out is why Murray expects
republican virtues to flourish in an empire. Why should our empire
be any less decadent than any of the others?

Readers
can relax. I have largely repaired the moral and ethical damage
I suffered. Except for the blue language, that is. Fighting with
recalcitrant software or poor mechanical design can still elicit
some loud and nasty phrases from me. Sadly, many of my compatriots
have not been so fortunate. Our culture and civilization has correspondingly
suffered.

February
14, 2001

Steve
Berg is a doctoral student in political science and public administration
in DeKalb, Illinois.

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare
  • LRC Blog

  • LRC Podcasts