Of Patriots and Scoundrels

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare

Having
read the numerous critiques of Mel Gibson’s new movie, "The
Patriot," I must admit that I was predisposed to like it. Watching
the British get into an uproar over an imagined injustice starts
my day off right. When traitorous American liberals got in on the
fun I began to think this might really be my kind of film. Once
again the Brits and the Tories have teamed up to attack freedom-loving
Americans so it’s time to fire yet another shot over their bow.

Let’s
review what those outraged individuals have been saying about our
revolutionary war as depicted in Mel Gibson’s new film:

The
British soldiers behaved like gentlemen and are misrepresented in
this movie.

Consider
the British prison hulks where American captives were kept for an
excellent example of how they waged war. Not too gentlemanly for
the American captives who starved to death there. The massacre at
Waxhaws was not invented, and Bloody Ban Tareleton was a real person – and a war criminal. That he was popular in Liverpool after the
war (a claim made recently) says more about the people there than
it does about Tareleton.

Don’t
forget for a second that it was the British who invented the concentration
camp, not the Germans. Remember their war of aggression against
the Boers?

It
was not the Americans who brought scalping to the American Indians,
or brought the Indians into the American Revolution, unleashing
that particular horror against the settlers. A horror that would
be repaid in full. It was the British, paying their Indian allies
by the scalp, with no qualms about who it had belonged to, whether
man, woman, or child. How very civilized. I am reminded that Lord
Jeffrey Amherst introduced a nice tweak to frontier fighting: germ
warfare via smallpox-infected blankets to the Indians who had offended
the Crown..

Atrocities
like those depicted in the movie never happened.

Really?
Study up a bit and you’ll find that the civil war that raged in
the midst of all this was fought with astonishing brutality on both
sides. It should be noted that Colonel Banastre Tarelton or "Bloody
Ban" as he was called — actually commanded a Tory Legion of
green-coated American loyalists who were quite as brutal as anything
depicted in the movie. In the movie Tarelton is depicted in the
Tavington character who while overage for the job (Tareleton was
barely twenty when he killed his first prisoner) certainly brings
a Snidely Whiplash sort of villainy to the screen.

As
for atrocities? Are these people such pollyannas? What do they think
happens in a war? How many churches were destroyed, people and all,
when the British and Americans firebombed Dresden? Or is out of
line, somehow, to mention that sort of atrocity? The British
practically invented atrocities.

Hasn’t
anyone read the classic Island Fortress, which American kids
used to grow up on? A wonderful tale about Francis Marion and the
war in the South. No doubts about atrocities for those of us who
grew up on classic Americana. We fought for freedom against a wicked
pack of scoundrels and their foreign mercenaries. Are there any
questions? No sir!

Twelve
million Indians were killed by the Americans.

Huh?
What did the settlers do, set up Auschwitz on the Hudson? It’s way
past time to get in the face of liars who make such statements.
To find 12 million dead Indians one must look to the sub continent;
where of course the British held sway. Ever see the images of Sepoys
tied to the mouths of cannons? That is British justice, and they
didn’t learn that from the Germans or from the Americans

The
movie depicts the British as behaving like the Waffen SS.

Saying
the British are depicted as SS men is entirely backwards – it would
be far more appropriate to say that the SS men behaved like the
British. Although, even Hitler never came up with a horror like
the punishment King George used for those convicted of treason:
have you by chance a clue as to just what it means to be hanged,
drawn, and quartered?

Realpolitic
is a German usage but they learned it from the British, after enduring
an uneasy alliance with them during the Napoleonic Wars. For more
on that see Peter Hofshroer’s two volume classic on the 1815 campaign
and see for yourself who started the dynamic that led to two world
wars in the next century.

It
should be stated that the SS men would have found no place in Germany
had not the British (and French) pursued their abominable Versailles
treaty and attendant policies which virtually assured a second world
war. Finally, it was the English who brought America into the first
war, one in which we had no national interest, but which having
involved ourselves, tilted history in a way that haunts us still.

The
movie is based solely on Gibson’s Anglophobia.

Wrong
again. Historically speaking, in this movie the British didn’t come
off all that badly. We have identified quite a few things Gibson
chose to ignore which could have made the British look really
bad.

Slavery
was a peculiarly American problem and blacks were depicted inaccurately
in the movie.

Who
settled the slave states? Oh…it was the British and it was they
who brought the slaves here in the first place. Slavery was quite
as legal in Britain at that time as it was in the US. Yet one never
found too many free blacks in Britain or perhaps someone would care
to note a painting that shows one, or a book that mentions one?
Freeing slaves came much later and certainly not in London — that
would have been unseemly. Indeed, in Britain, white men were treated
as slaves.

There were indeed free black men fighting in the revolution against
the British and to those who wish to open a book, instead of their
mouth, it can be readily ascertained that it a free black was one
of those killed at the Boston massacre. See the early paintings
of the battles in the South and at Breeds Hill for contemporary
views of black men at war.

Worst
of all, are the lies spouted by Americans revisionists who claim
that the colonists didn’t really own their own personal muskets,
the assault rifles of the day.

When
you hear this particular bit of mendacity, tremble, for your very
freedom is at stake. As a recent college graduate told me over lunch:
he had at least six classes which used frequent references to the
Communist Manifesto and other Marxist claptrap, but could
not remember a single class that discussed the verities of the American
experience or our history. His degree is not in economics by the
way, but in computer science. Bar the doors, there are ravening
wolves out there.

The
liars who say we did not own our own weapons know very well what
actually went on back then, they just don’t want you to know — it
is merely a tactic. One imagines them finally collecting all our
personal weapons and then turning around and taking off the smarmy
mask and croaking in a paroxysm of devilish humor, "Surprise!"
And darkness gathers over the land…

As
to the movie itself? I was kind of disappointed — I’d heard the
battle scenes ran too long and found quite the opposite to be true.
I missed the stirring sound track of "Last of the Mohicans"
but no one could fault the visual imagery. John Ford could have
helped a lot with this movie but the bottom line I guess, is this:
I loved it despite its flaws. I hadn’t had so much fun since I sang
every verse of Johnny Horton’s classic "The Battle of New Orleans"
to a bunch of British types in the Corporal and Private’s Mess in
Salisbury. It really riled ‘em when I got to the part where it says
"They RAN through briars and they RAN through the brambles
and they RAN through places where a rabbit wouldn’t go!" Everybody
but the Brits joined in on the chorus and we all had a great laugh.
Eventually, though, even the Brits saw the fun and we moved on to
"I’m proud to be a Londoner." In these perilous times
however, it’s no longer fun and every thing is about ideology. Our
country (and theirs too, by the way) has sunk into a despotic morass
and sadly, the time for fun is well behind us.

So
God bless Mel Gibson, and the men and boys who shouldered their
muskets and drove those rascals back across the Atlantic, where
their empire finally festered and died. There are quite few of those
type of people still hanging around, gnawing at the fabric of our
republic, so keep your powder dry and for God’s sake, do NOT let
those miserable scoundrels take your guns. The enemy is always the
same, although he has switched from red coats to black SWAT drag;
and his intention is always the same, which is to enslave us. Our
response, too, must always be the same.

July
14, 2000

Mr.
Peirce fought with the Rhodesian freedom fighters (the Ian Smith
side, of course).

Michael
Peirce Archives

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare