My Conversation With Ben Bernanke, November 18, 2008

Email Print

of Implementation of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of
2008 and of Government Lending and Insurance Facilities: Impact
on the Economy and Credit Availability hearing before the Committee
on Financial Services, U.S. House of Representatives, November 18,

CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Texas.

Dr. PAUL. Thank
you, Mr. Chairman. My question is directed to Chairman Bernanke.
You know, for many years, the Austrian free market economists have
predicted all these problems would come, and they were certainly
correct in everything that they said. Of course, they are not very
satisfied, including myself, with the so-called solutions, because
it looks like we are spending a lot of energy and a lot of money
trying to patch a system together that is unworkable. So we have
Congress spending a lot of money; we have Treasury very much involved
in trying to pick and choose which worthless asset that we are going
to buy. And, of course, the Federal Reserve is involved in injecting
trillions of dollars that nobody seems to be keeping track of. But
what we are failing to do, I think, is to recognize that the system
no longer works. But I can understand why we do this. Because, you
know, if Congress couldn’t do this and if the Fed couldn’t do this
and the Treasury couldn’t do this, it would make us all irrelevant.
And instead of looking at the causes of this and then realizing
that the solutions aren’t going to be found here, we have to make
ourselves feel pretty important. But I think there is another reason
why we think we are pretty important. It is because, in a way, our
interference in the market corrections that tried to come about
since 1971 seemed to work. I mean, the failure started in 1971 with
a system that had no way of automatically correcting the balance
of payment in the current account deficits. And that is where the
problem has been. The economists, whether they were left, right,
or middle over the last several decades, have always said this current
account deficit is a big problem. Now it is totally out of hand.
So here we are, struggling with all these rules and shifting back
and forth and really getting nowhere. But my question is: When we
come to the full realization that the system is unworkable, what
are we going to do? What have you thought about doing? Already we
see talk in the newspapers, we see articles about a new international
world reserve currency. And, to me, that is pretty important, because
the fiat dollar reserve system is not going to work anymore. And
that is the information that we have to accept and decide what we
are going to do with in the future. This is not new in history.
Currencies have failed, financial systems have failed. And, generally,
to restore the confidence that everybody is talking about, they
usually have to go back to a currency with integrity to it rather
than just fiat money. And, you know, the stage is there; it is not
impossible. Already the central banks of the world still own 15
percent of all the gold that was ever mined in all of history. So
they hold on to this gold for some reason. And, therefore, something
has to give, or are we going to keep trying to waste more money
and time patching this system together? Just last week, there was
a report that Iran purchased $75 billion worth of gold, took their
reserves out of Europe, bought gold, and put it in Asia. So is that
a sign of the times, and is that moving on? Now, my question is,
in your meetings, and you had a meeting just recently with other
central bankers, does this thought come up, about a new international
world reserve currency? And, if so, does the subject of gold ever
come up? How do you restore the confidence? Have you recently had
conversation with any central banker? And is there a move on to
replace the dollar system? Because the dollar system is essentially
declared dead because it is not working. But this, indeed, was predictable
because of these tremendous imbalances that were never allowed to
be corrected, and they were always patched up. We always came in.
We would spend, we would inflate, we would run up deficits. And,
since 1971, we have been able to correct these problems. Could you
tell me what kind of conversations you have had regarding a new
reserve currency?

Yes, Congressman. I don’t think the dollar system is dead. I think
the dollar remains the premier international currency. We have seen
a good bit of appreciation in the dollar recently during the crisis
precisely because there has been a lot of interest in the safe haven
and the liquidity of dollar markets. And the Federal Reserve has
been engaged in swap agreements to make sure there is enough dollar
liquidity in other countries because the need for dollars is so
strong. So I think the dollar system remains quite strong. I do
agree with you very much on one point, which is about the current
accounts. The current account imbalances have proven to be a very
serious problem. It was, in fact, the large capital inflows from
those current accounts which created a lot of the financial imbalances
we saw and have led to some of the problems we are seeing. And one
of the silver linings in this huge great cloud is that we are seeing
some improvement in greater balance in our current account deficits.

Dr. PAUL. But
does the subject of a new regime ever come up?

No, it doesn’t.

Dr. PAUL. And
does the subject of gold ever come up in any of your conversations?

Only in terms of the sales that the central banks are planning.

the Ron Paul File


Dr. Ron
Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.

Paul Archives

Email Print